EURef Forum
»
Blog Comments
»
Blog
»
EU referendum: a challenge from Merkel
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,947 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 95 times Was thanked: 293 time(s) in 245 post(s)
|
Seen as a victory for Mr Cameron by some press reports in the wake of his "Europe" speech, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was reported as saying she wanted "to see a deal" with Britain. The Mail claims he "even won the support of Germany's Angela Merkel". However, Quentin Peel in the Financial Times thinks celebrations may be premature, and that Cameron is in danger of misreading Merkel. There is a long British tradition, he says, of failing to understand Berlin. Although Merkel had sent a clear message from Berlin after Mr Cameron's speech on Wednesday, that Germany did not want the UK to leave the EU, she also told Cameron that, if he was just pursuing narrow national (or party) interests, this was a game everyone might play. The European game, she said, was about compromise. View full article here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 246 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Somerset Thanks: 2 times Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 23 post(s)
|
On 'This Week' with Andrew Neil on BBC 1 Alan Johnston, Michael Portillo, Shirley Williams and Neil Hamilton all reckoned Dave would NOT hold a referendum in 2017. It was a bit rushed to get their u=individual reasons ut Neil Hamilton said because he was unlikely to be in power and the others just seemed to believe he wouldn't be able to hold one period.
My own opinion is that the promise he has made counts for NOTHING for even if he is in power he will find a way to avoid having one. I don't think he will say he had his fingers crossed when making the speech but I can see him saying that due to various events within the EU the need for a referendum is no longer necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 38 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Herefordshire Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
I liked the Brighton train idea in the earlier approach. OT, and not quite the Harrogate Agenda, I've been thinking about a very different approach to enabling grassroot democracy (including recall). Damning criticism welcomed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,947 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 95 times Was thanked: 293 time(s) in 245 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Frank Davis  I liked the Brighton train idea in the earlier approach. OT, and not quite the Harrogate Agenda, I've been thinking about a very different approach to enabling grassroot democracy (including recall). Damning criticism welcomed. Why bother with the monkeys? We want to be the organ grinders. Grassroot democracy requires a structure of direct democracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 38 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Herefordshire Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Which monkeys? And which organ grinder? Your analogy escapes me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,947 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 95 times Was thanked: 293 time(s) in 245 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Frank Davis  Which monkeys? And which organ grinder? Your analogy escapes me. It is a question of power. In a representative democracy, the representatives (the MPs) have the power - in theory. That makes them the organ-grinders and us the moneys. In the Harrogate Agenda, the people acquire power. They become the organ-grinders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 105
Thanks: 6 times Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
|
Quote:Dr. North wrote: Come 2017, Mr Cameron - if he has been elected - may find he has no treaty, no victory and nothing to offer the people of Britain. What will he do then poor thing?
Sit out the last few years. Probably hand over the reigns to 'BoJo', if he's in parliament by then, write his memoirs, do the after dinner speech circuit and wait to be offered a nice cushy job. Well, its what they all do isn't it ? The rest does not matter. He would have done what he set out to do. Move us ever closer to the union.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,947 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 95 times Was thanked: 293 time(s) in 245 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Mark B  Quote:Dr. North wrote: Come 2017, Mr Cameron - if he has been elected - may find he has no treaty, no victory and nothing to offer the people of Britain. What will he do then poor thing?
Sit out the last few years. Probably hand over the reigns to 'BoJo', if he's in parliament by then, write his memoirs, do the after dinner speech circuit and wait to be offered a nice cushy job. Well, its what they all do isn't it ? The rest does not matter. He would have done what he set out to do. Move us ever closer to the union. I cannot believe that there would not be a colossal political penalty if Cameron reneged once again. This would be grounds for a rebellion and wholesale revolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 274  Location: Essex Thanks: 72 times Was thanked: 40 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: richard  . . . What will he do then poor thing? I think, more importantly, what will we do then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,947 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 95 times Was thanked: 293 time(s) in 245 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: letmethink  Originally Posted by: richard  . . . What will he do then poor thing? I think, more importantly, what will we do then? See above. It will be an interesting test of our resolve ... whether we just roll over and accept it, or take to the streets. One can imagine though that Cameron might try delaying tactics, putting off the day rather than cancelling it. That is very much his style - at his heart, the man is a coward. As it drags into the election (2020), we see an electoral reaction and he is slung out on his neck. The alternative scenario is now - as time passes, his referendum offer is seen as less and less credible so that, by the time of this election, it has lost any force. Disillusion sets in and Cameron loses the election in 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 31/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 89 ![Australia Australia]() Location: Tasmania Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Although German opinion appears divided about Cameron's negotiation-&-referendum speech & his objection to ever closer union, the EU's Commission staff clearly are displeased. Their punishment for Britain's apparent challenge to their sovereignity is to fine the UK 300,000 euros (about £250,000) per day for failing to implement two EU directives on how gas and electricity markets operate in the EU, & therefore should operate in Britain. The deadline for member states to have adopted this energy legislation was March 2011. Perhaps because they have not rocked the boat in the way the Commission staff probably considers Britain has through Cameron's recent speech, Bulgaria and Estonia, which have also failed to comply, face much smaller fines of just £14,000 a day and £7,500 a day respectively. See: http://www.dailymail.co.....html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Perhaps the Commission will, unintentionally, prove our EU-exit cause's best recruiting sergeant ever! Watchet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 232 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Thanks: 17 times Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 11 post(s)
|
This is all taking it for granted that Merkel will still be in power then. Edited by user 25 January 2013 12:45:54(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 155 Location: None
Thanks: 27 times Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
"Merkel's patience with the British has its limits, does it." Hmmmm. So our patience with the murky female must have no limits? We are subordinate, after all - especially if we 'play' for subsidiarity. She is and will be our "supervisor." So we'd better learn our place, or we'll be disciplined. Right? Edited by user 25 January 2013 16:20:45(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 19 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Norfolk Thanks: 22 times
|
Originally Posted by: Watchet  Although German opinion appears divided about Cameron's negotiation-&-referendum speech & his objection to ever closer union, the EU's Commission staff clearly are displeased. Their punishment for Britain's apparent challenge to their sovereignity is to fine the UK 300,000 euros (about £250,000) per day for failing to implement two EU directives on how gas and electricity markets operate in the EU, & therefore should operate in Britain. The deadline for member states to have adopted this energy legislation was March 2011. Perhaps because they have not rocked the boat in the way the Commission staff probably considers Britain has through Cameron's recent speech, Bulgaria and Estonia, which have also failed to comply, face much smaller fines of just £14,000 a day and £7,500 a day respectively. See: http://www.dailymail.co.....html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Perhaps the Commission will, unintentionally, prove our EU-exit cause's best recruiting sergeant ever! Watchet But surely we, or our supine 'powers that be' are not going to be so craven as to pay these ridiculous levies!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 128
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
|
Quote:Peel reminds us that Merkel is already backing away from the need for big treaty change, and that she will do whatever she can without treaty change. She knows that French president François Hollande, her closest ally in Europe, is desperate to avoid any referendum in France.
For her part, Ms Merkel is still unclear about what Mr Cameron wants, adds Peel She wants to know if he is seeking – "for ideological reasons" – the repatriation of primary law (i.e., treaty changes), or whether he will be satisfied with "pragmatic" reduction of secondary legislation. She also wants to know if he is seeking to reduce unnecessary EU legislation for everyone, or just for the UK. Perhaps it has become like wrestling: Dave is playing the baddie to reinforce Merkel and Hollande's desire to avoid a new treaty. Your appraisal of the German media makes them sound just like ours - inflating Merkel's authority as ours do with Cameron. Both Merkel and Hollande and many others are constrained by having to appear to be putting national interests and considerations first, and having to account for how other nations view them, just as Dave is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURef Forum
»
Blog Comments
»
Blog
»
EU referendum: a challenge from Merkel
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.