logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
2 Pages12>
Media: plumbing the depths
Options View Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
richard
#1 Posted : 04 February 2013 14:58:56(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,377
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 113 times
Was thanked: 343 time(s) in 285 post(s)
Quite a jolly story about Richard III in the Daily Mail, but one is a little perturbed to find he was buried "in a grave around 680 metres (2,231 feet) below ground level". How on earth (to coin a phrase) did they find him?

Actually, I think this is the curse of metric again. The word "metres" seems to have the effect of switching off that part of the brain that records measurement, so that numbers become totally meaningless.

Interestingly, the Mail also runs a piece by the same author (Damien Gayle) about finding signs of life buried beneath the West Antarctic ice sheet. The depth is put at "HALF A MILE" (in caps), and is instantly recognisable.

View full article here
Back to top
WWW
john in cheshire
#2 Posted : 04 February 2013 15:27:17(UTC)
john in cheshire

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 64
United Kingdom
Location: cheshire

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Richard, I too gasped when I read the supposed depth of this grave. Then I realised it was a newspaper report. I wonder though if this is the Leicester equivalent of Piltdown man?
Back to top
richard
#3 Posted : 04 February 2013 15:34:44(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,377
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 113 times
Was thanked: 343 time(s) in 285 post(s)
Originally Posted by: john in cheshire Go to Quoted Post
Richard, I too gasped when I read the supposed depth of this grave. Then I realised it was a newspaper report. I wonder though if this is the Leicester equivalent of Piltdown man?



You said it ... it's a newspaper report!
Back to top
WWW
Bob Fox
#4 Posted : 04 February 2013 15:36:52(UTC)
Bob Fox

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 62
United Kingdom
Location: Huddersfield

Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 2 post(s)
6.8 metres would still be a long way underground. Also, the last paragraph you quoted was nonsense, as having his hands crossed indicates that he was laid out with his hands crossed. Why would anyone tie the hands of a corpse? Perhaps this indicates that the tudors believed he would turn into a zombie and try to claw his way out!
Back to top
mmatis
#5 Posted : 04 February 2013 16:49:05(UTC)
mmatis

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 462
Man
United States
Location: Cocoa, Florida

Thanks: 92 times
Was thanked: 36 time(s) in 27 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: john in cheshire Go to Quoted Post
Richard, I too gasped when I read the supposed depth of this grave. Then I realised it was a newspaper report. I wonder though if this is the Leicester equivalent of Piltdown man?



You said it ... it's a newspaper report!


Would it not be equally likely to be found on the telly, as well? Or does the Beebe at least properly screen for such?

Edited by user 04 February 2013 16:50:01(UTC)  | Reason: Add adverb.
Back to top
vincent
#6 Posted : 04 February 2013 17:23:01(UTC)
vincent

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 991
United Kingdom
Location: Sunderland

Thanks: 87 times
Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 29 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Bob Fox Go to Quoted Post
6.8 metres would still be a long way underground. Also, the last paragraph you quoted was nonsense, as having his hands crossed indicates that he was laid out with his hands crossed. Why would anyone tie the hands of a corpse? Perhaps this indicates that the tudors believed he would turn into a zombie and try to claw his way out!



Well apart from the 680m the positioning of the hands also struck me as odd.Someone explained he may have been tied over a horse whilst transported after being killed.By the look of his hasty burial maybe they could not be bothered to untie his hands,there was obviously little respect shown in death either way.

The king is dead ...long live the King.

Edited by user 04 February 2013 17:36:09(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
Back to top
jaguar driver
#7 Posted : 04 February 2013 17:46:34(UTC)
jaguar driver

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 93
United Kingdom
Location: Hampshire

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Somewhere I have kept a rather old cutting from the front page of the Daily Express of Sept 1994.
It declared that the previous August had been the driest month since records began with a months rainfall of only 6.1m.

I said to myself, 'Oh really, that is about 20 foot of water'.
I presumed they had meant 6.1mm which is 1/4inch of water.
I used to keep as many of these howlers whenever I saw them and used that cutting and others to tease all the metric imbeciles I met.
I used to point out that the misprinted 6.1m could be metres, centimetres or millimetres but we would never be able to fathom (sorry) it out correctly. If the report had been printed in Imperial measure there would be no way that 1/4 inch could ever be misprinted as anything else and certainly not as 20 foot of water.
Another good one was the report of diesel cars producing 150kg of carbon soot every Kilometre.
That computes as 330lbs per half mile. Yep I thought, another newspaper calculation that is impossible to retread back and recalculate. Did they mean 150kg every 100km or 1000km or did they mean 150g per km or 100km or 1000km... or or or...Angry
It was always bollox.
(yes, I know, I ought to get out more often) BigGrin

There is a Time Team special on tonight about Richard III.
They like their metric measures, Tony Robinson was talking in kilometres on the Sunday program yesterday.
It is easier to speak in Imperial,
Inches is easier that Millimetres
Feet easier than metres
Yards easier than metres,
Miles easier than Kilometres.
and as for buying petrol by the litre..where does a litre get you.. it is like buying beer by the teacup.

Rant over. BigGrin

Back to top
mmatis
#8 Posted : 04 February 2013 18:17:56(UTC)
mmatis

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 462
Man
United States
Location: Cocoa, Florida

Thanks: 92 times
Was thanked: 36 time(s) in 27 post(s)
Originally Posted by: jaguar driver Go to Quoted Post
Somewhere I have kept a rather old cutting from the front page of the Daily Express of Sept 1994.
It declared that the previous August had been the driest month since records began with a months rainfall of only 6.1m.

I said to myself, 'Oh really, that is about 20 foot of water'.
I presumed they had meant 6.1mm which is 1/4inch of water.
I used to keep as many of these howlers whenever I saw them and used that cutting and others to tease all the metric imbeciles I met.
I used to point out that the misprinted 6.1m could be metres, centimetres or millimetres but we would never be able to fathom (sorry) it out correctly. If the report had been printed in Imperial measure there would be no way that 1/4 inch could ever be misprinted as anything else and certainly not as 20 foot of water.
Another good one was the report of diesel cars producing 150kg of carbon soot every Kilometre.
That computes as 330lbs per half mile. Yep I thought, another newspaper calculation that is impossible to retread back and recalculate. Did they mean 150kg every 100km or 1000km or did they mean 150g per km or 100km or 1000km... or or or...Angry
It was always bollox.
(yes, I know, I ought to get out more often) BigGrin

There is a Time Team special on tonight about Richard III.
They like their metric measures, Tony Robinson was talking in kilometres on the Sunday program yesterday.
It is easier to speak in Imperial,
Inches is easier that Millimetres
Feet easier than metres
Yards easier than metres,
Miles easier than Kilometres.
and as for buying petrol by the litre..where does a litre get you.. it is like buying beer by the teacup.

Rant over. BigGrin

Well, nothing wrong with beer by the teacup. As long as it's the RIGHT teacup:
http://www.baronbob.com/giant-teacupandsaucer.htm
Back to top
 1 user thanked mmatis for this useful post.
thespecialone on 04/02/2013(UTC)
JohnFSK
#9 Posted : 04 February 2013 18:40:26(UTC)
JohnFSK

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/08/2012(UTC)
Posts: 18
United Kingdom
Location: Cheshire
Tony Robinson is a hard core leftist, which is no doubt why he prefers not to use the Imperial system, but rather the system devised by French regicides, and which was enthusiastically adopted by Lenin.
Back to top
thespecialone
#10 Posted : 04 February 2013 18:48:59(UTC)
thespecialone

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 209
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Gloucestershire

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
I actually heard a weather guesser on some channel or such actually converting centigrade to fahrenheit and then condascendingly stating "and that is for those who prefer it in old money". I thought - what a prick.
Back to top
jaguar driver
#11 Posted : 04 February 2013 18:52:20(UTC)
jaguar driver

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 93
United Kingdom
Location: Hampshire

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Mmatis said:-
Quote:
Well, nothing wrong with beer by the teacup. As long as it's the RIGHT teacup:
http://www.baronbob.com/giant-teacupandsaucer.htm


OutStanding.. !ThumpUp

Thank you.
Back to top
thespecialone
#12 Posted : 04 February 2013 18:56:07(UTC)
thespecialone

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 209
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Gloucestershire

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
The only way I can link this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news...-bill.html#axzz2JxRx0ndO to the Richard III story is that it is in a newspaper. But thought that as you live in Bradford you may know more than this article is letting on; or you may know that actual truth.

It looks like you will have to initially pay (the council are reimbursing the residents) for more eco-madness but the council reckons it is going to get the money back off the builders. Am I missing something here but did the council not have to approve the building every bit of this development and therefore should have known that the eco-madness scheme was a dud?

Edited by user 04 February 2013 18:59:29(UTC)  | Reason: Add and extra line
Back to top
EU3x2
#13 Posted : 04 February 2013 19:49:29(UTC)
EU3x2

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 74
United Kingdom
Location: Yorkshire

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Saw them fannying about in a hole on the TV news - 68cm
Back to top
Moth Eared
#14 Posted : 04 February 2013 19:54:59(UTC)
Moth Eared

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 29
United Kingdom
Location: South

Thanks: 5 times
He was found easily because there was .... a mole.

I'll get my coat.
Back to top
EU3x2
#15 Posted : 04 February 2013 20:10:35(UTC)
EU3x2

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 74
United Kingdom
Location: Yorkshire

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Originally Posted by: thespecialone Go to Quoted Post
The only way I can link this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news...-bill.html#axzz2JxRx0ndO to the Richard III story is that it is in a newspaper. But thought that as you live in Bradford you may know more than this article is letting on; or you may know that actual truth.

It looks like you will have to initially pay (the council are reimbursing the residents) for more eco-madness but the council reckons it is going to get the money back off the builders. Am I missing something here but did the council not have to approve the building every bit of this development and therefore should have known that the eco-madness scheme was a dud?


Solar energy in Bradford - now that is funny

Quote:
'We appreciate that it is a serious problem and we are working with residents, the building contractor, the energy company and our managing agents, Yorkshire Housing, to find a solution.

'We are confident that when these problems have been resolved, residents at Pavilion Gardens will benefit from lower bills in the future.


We had our face in the trough but others ate more than we did. Our models, however, project great savings by 2037. At which point our subsidiary companies will have been well and truly 'wound up'.

Edited by user 04 February 2013 20:32:28(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
Back to top
cjw1954
#16 Posted : 04 February 2013 21:05:04(UTC)
cjw1954

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 32
United Kingdom
Location: London

Thanks: 10 times
I've seen these metric mix-ups before. It's OK when someone orders the wrong size boxes at work (it was hilarious, actually) - but when someone gives you 10 times the dose of something in hospital it's not so good!

Glad to see they've finally tracked him down. I think he should now go on a nationwide tour before being laid to rest at Middleham Castle.
Back to top
euSSR Go Home
#17 Posted : 04 February 2013 21:37:55(UTC)
euSSR Go Home

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 191
Location: None

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Ha ha, and that froggish stuff is supposed to be simpler than ours Laugh

What if they really mean 6 to 8 feet, but don't know how to translate their foreign muck into English?

Ah well.

And who's certifying that this really is the Bad Lad of York? I have a hard time believing any of the new lot. We can't trust foreign-inspired half-wits; have they turned to any of our own who know what they're talking about?

Back to top
WWW
richard
#18 Posted : 04 February 2013 21:43:07(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,377
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 113 times
Was thanked: 343 time(s) in 285 post(s)
Originally Posted by: euSSR Go Home Go to Quoted Post
Ha ha, and that froggish stuff is supposed to be simpler than ours Laugh

What if they really mean 6 to 8 feet, but don't know how to translate their foreign muck into English?

Ah well.

And who's certifying that this really is the Bad Lad of York? I have a hard time believing any of the new lot. We can't trust foreign-inspired half-wits; have they turned to any of our own who know what they're talking about?



Well, he had no feet, so he must be a foreigner.

Back to top
WWW
 1 user thanked richard for this useful post.
mmatis on 04/02/2013(UTC)
euSSR Go Home
#19 Posted : 04 February 2013 22:24:13(UTC)
euSSR Go Home

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 191
Location: None

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: euSSR Go Home Go to Quoted Post
Ha ha, and that froggish stuff is supposed to be simpler than ours Laugh

What if they really mean 6 to 8 feet, but don't know how to translate their foreign muck into English?

Ah well.

And who's certifying that this really is the Bad Lad of York? I have a hard time believing any of the new lot. We can't trust foreign-inspired half-wits; have they turned to any of our own who know what they're talking about?



Well, he had no feet, so he must be a foreigner.
Laugh

Don't tell me ... I don't want to know how these pseudopods measure horse-height. Mellow

Actually I just perused the 'story' and see it's the bods at Leicester who ID the remains. I know there are good people there.

However, some of the other moderns get a bit carried away with their re-inscriptions, so careful consideration of the history is in order. I read up a lot while I was studying Margaret Beaufort (The King's Mother); she played a fascinating role in preserving her little boy Henry (VII) for Tudor Destiny. We know that a couple of advantages consolidated the end of a terrible Edward IV (a europhile if there ever was one), and the establishment of relative peace after more than half a century of 'Roses.' Regardless of modern bigotry against the Tudors, though, maybe we'll now enjoy a resurgence of Malory and Le Morte D'arthur - which Caxton (an Edward/Richard/Duchess of Burgundy man) printed at Westminster in 1485 BigGrin . Well, a person can hope....

Edited by user 05 February 2013 05:06:19(UTC)  | Reason: correction
Back to top
WWW
Ravenscar
#20 Posted : 05 February 2013 00:13:00(UTC)
Ravenscar

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,019
Location: The North

Thanks: 126 times
Was thanked: 150 time(s) in 100 post(s)
Time he was back home in his allotment and six foot of Yorkshire earth, the Minster a fitting resting place for the last Plantagenet King.

Metric, is a pain who the hell thinks in litres in the pub?

F**k em, f**k metres and f**k the EU.
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.273 seconds.