logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

richard
#1 Posted : 30 January 2013 12:57:34(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,999
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
EU politics: a debate in the House

Going on now, opened by foreign secretary, William Hague. "A new global race is underway", he says. Would this race be the political class?

View full article here

and

EU politics: look elsewhere for the debate

View full article here

Edited by user 30 January 2013 18:57:32(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

William Gruff
#2 Posted : 30 January 2013 13:21:19(UTC)
William Gruff

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 90
United Kingdom
Location: Lytham St Annes

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 11 post(s)
A race that can only survive by enslaving the human race.
Ravenscar
#3 Posted : 30 January 2013 14:14:42(UTC)
Ravenscar

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 911
Location: The North

Thanks: 111 times
Was thanked: 119 time(s) in 84 post(s)
Are we beholden to the banks, or to the EU............ or are they one and the same thing?
TheBoilingFrog
#4 Posted : 30 January 2013 16:36:21(UTC)
TheBoilingFrog

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 375
United Kingdom
Location: Didcot

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 24 post(s)
Quote:
We have Richard Ottaway, chairman of the foreign affairs committee, referring to "the Single Market … a British invention of Margaret Thatcher". Imbued with such formidable ignorance, people such as these disqualify themselves from the wider, grown-up debate.


*head in hands*

No wonder he's stepping down

http://www.bbc.co.uk/new...-england-london-20108756
richard
#5 Posted : 30 January 2013 16:58:41(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,999
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: TheBoilingFrog Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
We have Richard Ottaway, chairman of the foreign affairs committee, referring to "the Single Market … a British invention of Margaret Thatcher". Imbued with such formidable ignorance, people such as these disqualify themselves from the wider, grown-up debate.


*head in hands*

No wonder he's stepping down

http://www.bbc.co.uk/new...-england-london-20108756




He'll get a nice lucrative post in the City. But the broader issue is that no one challenged him and many of the Tory MPs repeated the same myth. These people have nothing to offer to the debate.

TheBoilingFrog
#6 Posted : 30 January 2013 17:32:14(UTC)
TheBoilingFrog

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 375
United Kingdom
Location: Didcot

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 24 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: TheBoilingFrog Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
We have Richard Ottaway, chairman of the foreign affairs committee, referring to "the Single Market … a British invention of Margaret Thatcher". Imbued with such formidable ignorance, people such as these disqualify themselves from the wider, grown-up debate.


*head in hands*

No wonder he's stepping down

http://www.bbc.co.uk/new...-england-london-20108756




He'll get a nice lucrative post in the City. But the broader issue is that no one challenged him and many of the Tory MPs repeated the same myth. These people have nothing to offer to the debate.



Yes quite, and I admire your magnanimous restraint in your response. In the face of such frustration and stupidity it really is difficult to refrain from articulating a much more robust response.

After this is over we all deserve a George Medal.
In2minds
#7 Posted : 30 January 2013 17:36:13(UTC)
In2minds

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 197
Location: midlands

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
MPs - And don't forget these people think they are worth a pay rise!
F U Fed Up
#8 Posted : 30 January 2013 17:57:16(UTC)
F U Fed Up

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/08/2012(UTC)
Posts: 263
United Kingdom

Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Terrifying......now if you asked them where the best meal was, or who pays the largest bungs...they'd all be runner up world champions....as the undisputed World Champions are all in Brussels
telecaster
#9 Posted : 30 January 2013 19:23:21(UTC)
telecaster

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 3
United Kingdom
Location: Essex

Hi. I am newly registered today. I have been visiting EUreferendum.com regularly of late. Thanks for providing detailed information on the topic. I'm an EU sceptic and support full withrawal by whatever means. I am concerned at the constant barrage of FUD stories in the MSM. Especially the '4 years of uncertainty damaging business investment' argument. It appears that this line of attack will continue for some time to come. It occurred to me while watching today's EU debate in parliament that an effective counter might be 'what about the greater and more prolonged uncertainty in the Eurozone?'. Such a response can be supplemented by asking 'where else in Europe are these uncertain businesses going to invest when the future of the Euro/Eurozone itself is even more uncertain?'. I haven't yet seen this response used on the message boards and blogs and I wondered if anyone thought that this line could be developed for the purposes of a united and consistent response?

On a more positive note. I suspect that this same 'uncertainty' argument may run out of steam as we approach the next election by which time a large chunk of the 4-year period will have eroded.
richard
#10 Posted : 30 January 2013 19:31:55(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,999
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: telecaster Go to Quoted Post
Hi. I am newly registered today. I have been visiting EUreferendum.com regularly of late. Thanks for providing detailed information on the topic. I'm an EU sceptic and support full withrawal by whatever means. I am concerned at the constant barrage of FUD stories in the MSM. Especially the '4 years of uncertainty damaging business investment' argument. It appears that this line of attack will continue for some time to come. It occurred to me while watching today's EU debate in parliament that an effective counter might be 'what about the greater and more prolonged uncertainty in the Eurozone?'. Such a response can be supplemented by asking 'where else in Europe are these uncertain businesses going to invest when the future of the Euro/Eurozone itself is even more uncertain?'. I haven't yet seen this response used on the message boards and blogs and I wondered if anyone thought that this line could be developed for the purposes of a united and consistent response?

On a more positive note. I suspect that this same 'uncertainty' argument may run out of steam as we approach the next election by which time a large chunk of the 4-year period will have eroded.




Welcome to the forum.

And yes, I think you're right. You can only run FUD for so long and it loses its power. The europhiles run the risk of peaking early, and boring the pants off everyone. And, as we've already pointed out ...

http://www.eureferendum....ogview.aspx?blogno=83470

... the ones who are warning about the terrors of leaving the EU are the self-same who wanted us to join the euro. With a four year campaign, we have the better arguments and time to develop them. And there, I still maintain that the EEA/Norway issue will be the key.

Edited by user 30 January 2013 20:38:11(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

telecaster
#11 Posted : 30 January 2013 19:44:16(UTC)
telecaster

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 3
United Kingdom
Location: Essex

Understood. thanks.
Moth Eared
#12 Posted : 30 January 2013 19:47:23(UTC)
Moth Eared

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 25
United Kingdom
Location: South

Thanks: 2 times
I am Moth Eared (stop sniggering at the back). There is a distinct lack of figures to your reportage of the debate, enquiring minds wish to know:

a. The quantity of rotten fruit products thrown at the TV/radio in North Towers throught the debate.

b. The percentage of the above which were on target.

c. The quantity of knitting / tumbril polishing completed during the event.

I should think you need a lie down in a quiet darkened room having submitted yourself to their nonsense, please consider taking the rest of the month off for suffering on our behalf.

Oh, and thank you for making it sound interesting, I'm serious ThumpUp
mmatis
#13 Posted : 30 January 2013 21:41:35(UTC)
mmatis

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 429
Man
United States
Location: Cocoa, Florida

Thanks: 84 times
Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 24 post(s)
One would only invoke Article 50 if one had an intention of offering a valid "referendum". What makes you think ANY of them are about to consider that, in light of all else they have done all these years? Do you presume that the Media shall make them do so? Or the major opposition parties? When the entire body politic is nothing more than one giant steaming turd, well...
comet
#14 Posted : 30 January 2013 22:30:05(UTC)
comet

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 616
United Kingdom
Location: gloucestershire

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 64 time(s) in 53 post(s)
Originally Posted by: mmatis Go to Quoted Post
One would only invoke Article 50 if one had an intention of offering a valid "referendum". What makes you think ANY of them are about to consider that, in light of all else they have done all these years? Do you presume that the Media shall make them do so? Or the major opposition parties? When the entire body politic is nothing more than one giant steaming turd, well...



I'd say on the part of the Conservatives there's some genuine confusion on this. They think that the EU has grown too big for its boots and stops them doing things such as minimum alcohol pricing and it could do with reform. They don't really have much idea about how it would be achieved, it would in a vague sense be a good idea.

However, there's no doubt that the leading core wants, and always has wanted, to stay in the EU, although they recognise there's a leakage to UKIP which needs something to stem it and flannel about renegotiation about our position in the EU is fine. Invoking Art 50 means getting out, the very thing they don't want to do. As far as the Conservatives are concerned, this has to be very carefully handled. They have to scratch the eurosceptic itch, but if they overdo it, say by making their position less vague, they are likely to whip up anti-EU sentiment, as more lose patience with them.

So we have almost the whole political and administrative classes pulling one way and a hard core of withdrawal sentiment (maybe 20% in the polls) which really has no way to register via general elections. We have a large section in the middle which thinks the EU has gone too far, or would be happy to stay in following successful negotiations, or don't feel that strongly about it. This is the section the discussion is aimed at.

The current political arrangement of two parties which are rival managers or dictators, and a huge administrative establishment with its own agenda, and large and important policy areas which people are lied to about, or there seems to be an agreement to avoid discussing, certainly isn't healthy.

I'd say that even with the present cozy arrangement, there's a level of public opinion which can't be ignored, although when you look at various things such as mass immigration, it's amazing how much people put up with.

However, since TPTB don't want to withdraw, it's no wonder they are avoiding discussing Art 50. I suppose the Poor Little Norway nonsense is a roundabout way of dismissing it without mentioning it.
Robert of Ottawa
#15 Posted : 31 January 2013 03:47:58(UTC)
Robert of Ottawa

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 73
Canada
Location: Ottawa

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Cameron promised, and then denied, a referendum before. His intentions are exactly the same now; that's why he has no serious plan ... that and that he is not a serious person.

It does tick me off, though, that UKIP don't have the leadership or whit to grab this opportunity seriously.
Robert of Ottawa
#16 Posted : 31 January 2013 04:12:03(UTC)
Robert of Ottawa

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 73
Canada
Location: Ottawa

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Ravenscar Go to Quoted Post
Are we beholden to the banks, or to the EU............ or are they one and the same thing?


It may come down to a battle between the EU central bank (name escapes me) and the City of London.
Robert of Ottawa
#17 Posted : 31 January 2013 04:29:37(UTC)
Robert of Ottawa

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 73
Canada
Location: Ottawa

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Originally Posted by: mmatis Go to Quoted Post
One would only invoke Article 50 if one had an intention of offering a valid "referendum". What makes you think ANY of them are about to consider that, in light of all else they have done all these years? Do you presume that the Media shall make them do so? Or the major opposition parties? When the entire body politic is nothing more than one giant steaming turd, well...


To my point. There has to be a ground-swell of demand for referendum. Tory Boy will forget his promise after being re-elected. I say print "Article 50" T-shirts and get some demos going.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.303 seconds.