logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

4 Pages123>»
richard
#1 Posted : 22 January 2013 23:26:28(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,981
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 300 time(s) in 252 post(s)
A bodyguard of lies

In a perverse sort of way, we can be quite encouraged by Mr Cameron's speech. A case that has to be surrounded with a bodyguard of lies is one that is inherently weak. Thus, we see not the Churchillian image of the truth surrounded by lies, but the greater lie ringed with still more lies. The Great Deception continues.

View full article here


I will not rest

"The most important political speech of his life", says the BBC. He has kicked off the debate with a promise of a referendum by the end of 2017 - in the first half of the next Parliament, on the basis of negotiating a new treaty change.

View full article here

Gathering of the euro-clans

That speech, it seems, is to be delivered at eight this morning – hit and run, one assumes, so that Mr Cameron can get back to preparing for PMQs. It should be an interesting session if there is a "Europe" question on the list.

Meanwhile, the euro-luvvies in the Conservative party are breaking ranks. Led by a modern-day Edwina Currie, by the name of Laura Sandys, 30 or so MPs are to push for an in-out referendum in the belief that they can win it.

Interestingly, to make her case, Sandys calls in aid UKIP, telling us that the party "misleadingly" provides "simple, but false choices". To leave Europe is presented as a zero-sum game, she claims, then having UKIP say ...

View full article here

Edited by user 23 January 2013 12:58:23(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

 1 user thanked richard for this useful post.
john in cheshire on 23/01/2013(UTC)
FaustiesBlog
#2 Posted : 23 January 2013 00:03:08(UTC)
FaustiesBlog

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 1

If you think there's a chance that UKIP might blow the campaign, then why don't you meet up with Farage, or teleconference with him or something - and discuss the issues you deem to be important?

Wouldn't you increase the volume of your voice inside the UKIP tent?

Farage has already accepted that the party needs to grow up and has explicitly said so on several occasions recently. Why not help it to grow up by being part of it and helping to shape it?

Please reconsider, Richard.

Edited by user 23 January 2013 00:05:49(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

rosie
#3 Posted : 23 January 2013 00:12:26(UTC)
rosie

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 74
United Kingdom
Location: London

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 7 post(s)
If you look at the comments on various MSM sites and many blogs, not the Guardian of course. it looks like more and more people are seeing the EU beasts for what they are, deceitful, greedy liars who want to keep us in the fold, at all costs, not because they really want us, but because if we left others, without a doubt, would follow suit.

The beasts are desperate to prevent this, that's why all the EU trash like, Mandlebug, Brittain, VAT man Branson et al are being trotted out in force.

I also think that many have taken on board the way Ireland was manipulated by the beasts.

I dread the comeback here, but Dr North, can you not bring yourself to contact someone with some influence at UKIP and advice them that Article 50 is the way to go, as I'm afraid that even though people appear to be seeing the EU for what it really is, the beasts will end up putting so much fear into the undecided that an IN/OUT referendum might not go the way we hope it would.
ikbenengels
#4 Posted : 23 January 2013 00:59:21(UTC)
ikbenengels

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 5
Location: England

Thanks: 25 times
Roger Helmer sounds like he has an inkling as to what is going on. He also seems 'clued up' on article 50. There must be a catch !

On the plus side, that list of names from the 'graUNiad' is useful in letting us know who NOT to believe........( to tell the truth I don't believe any of them anyway).

"It is our job to address their [the British people's] concerns and explain the rights and responsibilities, the numerous benefits and inevitable costs that come with being part of a community of 27 sovereign nations that have come together in pursuit of their common interests. "We should focus our efforts on doing exactly that."

Be certain that the complete opposite is what will happen.


Numerous benefits?

Edited by user 23 January 2013 01:02:16(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

richard
#5 Posted : 23 January 2013 01:13:46(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,981
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 300 time(s) in 252 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ikbenengels Go to Quoted Post



Numerous benefits?




Is zero a number?

richard
#6 Posted : 23 January 2013 01:18:24(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,981
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 300 time(s) in 252 post(s)
Originally Posted by: rosie Go to Quoted Post


I dread the comeback here, but Dr North, can you not bring yourself to contact someone with some influence at UKIP and advice them that Article 50 is the way to go, as I'm afraid that even though people appear to be seeing the EU for what it really is, the beasts will end up putting so much fear into the undecided that an IN/OUT referendum might not go the way we hope it would.




Tis other way round ... the break occurred because they didn't want to hear what I had to say. Farage is fully aware of the Art 50 argument.

 1 user thanked richard for this useful post.
pipesmoker on 23/01/2013(UTC)
Anoneumouse
#7 Posted : 23 January 2013 08:40:46(UTC)
Anoneumouse

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 35
United Kingdom
Location: Cumbria

Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
'I'm sure I'll take you with pleasure!' the Queen said.
'Twopence a week, and jam every other day.'

Alice couldn't help laughing, as she said, 'I don't want you to hire ME - and I don't care for jam.'

'It's very good jam,' said the Queen.

'Well, I don't want any TO-DAY, at any rate.'
'
You couldn't have it if you DID want it,' the Queen said. 'The rule is, jam to-morrow and jam yesterday - but never jam to-day.'

'It MUST come sometimes to "jam to-day,"' Alice objected.

'No, it can't,' said the Queen. 'It's jam every OTHER day: to-day isn't any OTHER day, you know.'

'I don't understand you,' said Alice. 'It's dreadfully confusing!'
Robertm
#8 Posted : 23 January 2013 08:44:08(UTC)
Robertm

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 68
United Kingdom
Location: Worcestershire

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Richard said
Quote:
Tis other way round ... the break occurred because they didn't want to hear what I had to say. Farage is fully aware of the Art 50 argument.



Farage mentioned article 50 on the World This Weekend on Radio 4 on Sunday 13 January in a discussion on Europe. He sounded as though he knew what he was saying.
letmethink
#9 Posted : 23 January 2013 09:05:56(UTC)
letmethink

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 278
Man
Location: Essex

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 41 time(s) in 29 post(s)
Just got this from my 85 year old Mother (from her iPad)

The Queen and David Cameron are on the same stage at the Diamond
Jubilee celebrations in front of a huge crowd. The Queen leans towards
Mr Cameron and says, "Do you know that with one little wave of my
hand, I can make every person in this crowd go wild with joy? This joy
will not only be a momentary display, but will go deep into their
hearts, and they will forever speak of this great day and rejoice!"
Cameron arrogantly replies, "I seriously doubt that Ma'am that with
one little wave of your hand you could do all that? Show me!" So the
Queen, with one swift wave,
smacked him in the mouth!!!


Well, I thought it was funny . . .
 4 users thanked letmethink for this useful post.
matokete on 23/01/2013(UTC), mmatis on 23/01/2013(UTC), nemesis on 23/01/2013(UTC), meltemian on 23/01/2013(UTC)
Diehard_TH
#10 Posted : 23 January 2013 09:15:50(UTC)
Diehard_TH

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 19
Location: SW England

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Quote:
0805: UKIP leader Nigel Farage, who wants to see the UK leave the EU, says the majority of British people support his party's position. He says: "If Mr Cameron was really serious about renegotiation then what he would do is he would invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which is the only mechanism that exists with the treaties to take powers back.


He's said it again, maybe there is hope. The problem is that UKIP is painted as a minority party of borderline loons thus having them support Art 50 might be counter-productive.

As for Cameron, words cannot express what a lying scumbag he is. Speech is purely to keep Con election hopes alive at next GE and not in support of this:

Quote:
0812: On Britain, the PM says: "We have the character of an island nation... passionate in defence of our sovereignty.


Here is what the above the liners all want:

Quote:
0816: Mr Cameron outlines his position: "I want the European Union to be a success and I want a relationship between Britain and the EU that keeps us in it."


What we need is a slogan - "Article 50: In Europe, out of the EU; in EFTA out of the EU"
ikbenengels
#11 Posted : 23 January 2013 09:35:17(UTC)
ikbenengels

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 5
Location: England

Thanks: 25 times
Richard said:

Is zero a number?

In Westminster, Brussels, and Strasbourg, it's a very large number- apparently.BigGrin
richard
#12 Posted : 23 January 2013 09:43:29(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,981
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 300 time(s) in 252 post(s)
Originally Posted by: FaustiesBlog Go to Quoted Post
If you think there's a chance that UKIP might blow the campaign, then why don't you meet up with Farage, or teleconference with him or something - and discuss the issues you deem to be important?

Wouldn't you increase the volume of your voice inside the UKIP tent?

Farage has already accepted that the party needs to grow up and has explicitly said so on several occasions recently. Why not help it to grow up by being part of it and helping to shape it?

Please reconsider, Richard.





Farage forced me out of the party and then forced me out of my job in the European Parliament. The walls are his, not mine. With the best will in the world, I can't help a man who won't be helped.

Edited by user 23 January 2013 10:23:35(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Diehard_TH
#13 Posted : 23 January 2013 09:54:23(UTC)
Diehard_TH

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 19
Location: SW England

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Cameron:
Quote:
And when we have negotiated that new settlement, we will give the British people a referendum with a very simple in or out choice. To stay in the EU on these new terms, or come out altogether.


It all depends on what "In" means and what "Out" means.

Does anyone think we would win the following after some faux negotiation with the colleagues:

"This government proposes that the UK approves the recent European negotiations or repeals the ECA, In or Out"?

All they will do is run a massive negative campaign against the perils of leaving and make the choice between 'hell' and the status quo. Can't really see any way around it except plugging Art 50 for all we are worth and hope that we get a better choice of referendum.
FITTLEWOOD
#14 Posted : 23 January 2013 10:24:31(UTC)
FITTLEWOOD

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 12
Location: SALISBURY

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Cameron's speech was so artful; meeting the Conservative rebel needs, undermining the UKIP position, stealing a (temporary) march on Labour.
All the time knowing that the rest of the EU have the whip hand, especially if Merkel is re-elected as seems probable. The colleagues could guess that with Britain's economic situation worsening the Tories will not win a General Election and a Labour victory or a Lib-Lab coalition/pact in Government will be sufficient to guarantee support for more EU.

It is worth remembering that IRELAND's public resistance to the euro was broken despite a dire financial situation. The EU propped up their "friend" with cash. GREECE is in a worse situation but does not wish to leave the EU. They were propped up with EU cash. SPAIN has 50% youth unemployment but the people are not voting to leave the EU. There is the promise of EU cash if needed. Whilst Germany and others in the IMF will lend the money, the EU should survive.

The public are very, very reluctant to let go of their benefactor despite their situation and poor voters find it difficult to mount election campaigns.

The only game in town for EUrealists over the next 16 months appears to be UKIP. At the moment they have the momentum in PR terms if not the boots on the ground for anything but a European election campaign. Can those who have fallen out with Farage in the past "hold their nose" and give support to UKIP ? There are hundreds of bloggers spending countless hours on their keyboard. Dr. Richard North has the bullets ready to fire. No need to pick over the arguments. Along with viral marketing on Twitter and Youtube is it time to do the hard and dirty job of knocking on doors and becoming candidates for UKIP (or another anti-EU party) or becoming an anti-EU INDEPENDENT candidate in the 2013 local elections ? Politics (influence) starts at Parish & Town Council level and these are easy elections to win - as the Liberal-Democrats showed in the 20th century and Labour showed in the 19th century, power starts at the bottom (are you listening Nigel ?).

Clarence
#15 Posted : 23 January 2013 10:24:40(UTC)
Clarence

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 66

Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 10 post(s)
100 Years Ago Today yet again (same apologies to Lord Gnome)

Quote:
This page contains the text of the Government-produced pamphlet advocating a vote to stay in the "European Community (Common Market)" in the 1975 British Referendum on continuing British membership.

THE NEW DEAL

The better terms which Britain will enjoy if we stay in the Common Market were secured only after long and tough negotiations.

These started in April 1974 and did not end until March of this year [1975].

On March 10 and 11 the Heads of Government met in Dublin and clinched the bargain. On March 18 the Prime Minister was able to make this announcements:

'I believe that our renegotiation objectives have been substantially though not completely achieved.'

What were the main objectives to which Mr Wilson referred? The most important were FOOD and MONEY and JOBS.

Dear Ed Llewellyn, you can save yourself a job and copy this out (if by some fluke your lot get in next time): http://www.harvard-digital.co.uk/euro/pamphlet.htm

Edited by user 23 January 2013 10:28:30(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

richard
#16 Posted : 23 January 2013 10:25:14(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,981
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 300 time(s) in 252 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Diehard_TH Go to Quoted Post
Cameron:
Quote:
And when we have negotiated that new settlement, we will give the British people a referendum with a very simple in or out choice. To stay in the EU on these new terms, or come out altogether.


It all depends on what "In" means and what "Out" means.

Does anyone think we would win the following after some faux negotiation with the colleagues:

"This government proposes that the UK approves the recent European negotiations or repeals the ECA, In or Out"?

All they will do is run a massive negative campaign against the perils of leaving and make the choice between 'hell' and the status quo. Can't really see any way around it except plugging Art 50 for all we are worth and hope that we get a better choice of referendum.



He is not in control of events ... the chances are that the renegotiation falls flat. There are some of the "colleagues" who would want to humiliate Cameron, and who would be happy to see the UK leave.

Mark B
#17 Posted : 23 January 2013 10:33:07(UTC)
Mark B

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 106

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Well, the can has been kicked ! But has it made it too the long grass ? Time will tell.

People should be wary. I seem to remember that the 2005 Labour Manifesto had a 'promise' of a referendum on Lisbon. Still waiting on that.

We all know here, that no Parliament may bind a future Parliament, so he can afford to make what ever laws he wants, Milliband can just repeal them. That in my view is just gesture politics, something that this man can just about do.



It is all very well UKIP, Farage and others to talk about Article 50. What is needed from them is a clear and coherent exit plan/strategy that people can understand and believe in. No good pulling the ejector seat handle on your burning aircraft, if you aircraft is less that 300ft and upside down. The end result of staying in, or leaving the aircraft is going to be the same. Better to know when and HOW to exit said aircraft, so that everything works in YOUR favour. Sure the procedure is scary and uncomfortable, but once done CORRECTLY you will be glad you did.

This must be the next step. Just batting the lies back will not work, even in the long run.

TheBoilingFrog
#18 Posted : 23 January 2013 10:33:36(UTC)
TheBoilingFrog

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 373
United Kingdom
Location: Didcot

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 23 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Diehard_TH Go to Quoted Post
Cameron:
Quote:
And when we have negotiated that new settlement, we will give the British people a referendum with a very simple in or out choice. To stay in the EU on these new terms, or come out altogether.


It all depends on what "In" means and what "Out" means.

Does anyone think we would win the following after some faux negotiation with the colleagues:

"This government proposes that the UK approves the recent European negotiations or repeals the ECA, In or Out"?

All they will do is run a massive negative campaign against the perils of leaving and make the choice between 'hell' and the status quo. Can't really see any way around it except plugging Art 50 for all we are worth and hope that we get a better choice of referendum.



He is not in control of events ... the chances are that the renegotiation falls flat. There are some of the "colleagues" who would want to humiliate Cameron, and who would be happy to see the UK leave.



That's why I'm sort of in two minds on whether to call Cameron's bluff, at least if he's re-elected it will nail this renegotiation myth once and for all (if he keeps his promise) by virtue of it not happening, then the subsequent outcome is huge pressure to leave.

letmethink
#19 Posted : 23 January 2013 10:48:35(UTC)
letmethink

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 278
Man
Location: Essex

Thanks: 72 times
Was thanked: 41 time(s) in 29 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post



He is not in control of events ... the chances are that the renegotiation falls flat. There are some of the "colleagues" who would want to humiliate Cameron, and who would be happy to see the UK leave.



I agree, the negotiations will fall flat but the question is 'how will they be presented?'

This is politics.

What does Cameron want? for us to stay in the EU.

What does the critical mass of the EU ruling elite want? for us to stay in the EU (I don't buy the notion that some may want us out - their whole purpose is to create a single European poitical entity over which they have power. Having a potentially prosperous independently influential sovereign state on the outskirts of their Empire is the last thing they want)

What are they faced with? a recalcitrant British (primarily English) population that is becoming increasingly realistic about the 'benefits' of being part of the EU.

What would I do if I were them?

I'd get together to work out the details of the speech that Cameron should make; I'd get together to work out how non-repatriation of powers could be presented as the opposite; I'd plan a timetable to get everything in place before a referendum, which would be promised post-election triumph; I'd lie as much as necessary to get what I want.

This all takes time and probably explains the multiple delays to his speech. He is just a front man and should be ignored

politics . . .
Diehard_TH
#20 Posted : 23 January 2013 11:02:24(UTC)
Diehard_TH

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 19
Location: SW England

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Originally Posted by: letmethink Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post



He is not in control of events ... the chances are that the renegotiation falls flat. There are some of the "colleagues" who would want to humiliate Cameron, and who would be happy to see the UK leave.



I agree, the negotiations will fall flat but the question is 'how will they be presented?'

This is politics.

What does Cameron want? for us to stay in the EU.

What does the critical mass of the EU ruling elite want? for us to stay in the EU (I don't buy the notion that some may want us out - their whole purpose is to create a single European poitical entity over which they have power. Having a potentially prosperous independently influential sovereign state on the outskirts of their Empire is the last thing they want)

What are they faced with? a recalcitrant British (primarily English) population that is becoming increasingly realistic about the 'benefits' of being part of the EU.

What would I do if I were them?

I'd get together to work out the details of the speech that Cameron should make; I'd get together to work out how non-repatriation of powers could be presented as the opposite; I'd plan a timetable to get everything in place before a referendum, which would be promised post-election triumph; I'd lie as much as necessary to get what I want.

This all takes time and probably explains the multiple delays to his speech. He is just a front man and should be ignored

politics . . .


That was exactly my point, the negotiations will be fake, they will present them as some amazing political coup for the UK and we will be given a stupid "Out" option that no-one will want ie repeal the ECA. Everyone will then vote for the status quo and we're fcuked.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.368 seconds.