logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

richard
#1 Posted : 19 December 2012 23:01:57(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,036
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
David Cameron yesterday announced that Britain would withdraw almost half of its 9,000 troops from Afghanistan next year, leaving local security forces to pick up the slack. And, exactly as predicted, Cameron is spinning furiously, telling parliament that this is possible "because of the success of our forces and the Afghan National Security Forces".

Elsewhere though, in Die Zeit, the unwanted truth seeps into the public domain. Afghan President Hamid Karzai is mocked again and again as mayor of Kabul. In the provinces, the writ of the warlords run, but only where the Taliban leaders do not hold sway.

No one will offer odds on how long the Karzai government will last, once the coalition troops withdraw, but "most experts" believe that it will be history within two years.

View full article here
 1 user thanked richard for this useful post.
john in cheshire on 20/12/2012(UTC)
Niall Warry
#2 Posted : 19 December 2012 23:11:59(UTC)
Niall Warry

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 264
United Kingdom
Location: Somerset

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 24 post(s)
Somebody has got to hold our politicians to account for the inevitable disaster that will befall Afghanistan when we have left and play back all their speeches and comments about the success of handing over to the Afghan forces.

History has taught us that involvement in Afghanistan always fails and this conflict will be no different.
Ravenscar
#3 Posted : 20 December 2012 00:39:46(UTC)
Ravenscar

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 921
Location: The North

Thanks: 113 times
Was thanked: 135 time(s) in 91 post(s)
Hasn't someone told Dave, pulling the troops out ain't easy 4000 miles from Blighty and in a landlocked country, surrounded as it is by people and nations hostile to anything remotely to do with namely Western but particularly British Armed forces.

The fun has only just started.
Robert of Ottawa
#4 Posted : 20 December 2012 00:46:19(UTC)
Robert of Ottawa

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 73
Canada
Location: Ottawa

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 6 post(s)
The strategy, adopted also by the US, of telling the enemy you are quitting in X is brilliant, just brilliant.

We await the new afghanistan with the new al quaeda and some democrat president indolently firing cruise missiles while "workplace violence" breaks out again in US bases.

Hmmm. How can you fight a war when you are not allowed to identify the enemy?
rhaan
#5 Posted : 20 December 2012 03:57:36(UTC)
rhaan

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 194
Germany
Location: Xanten

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 14 post(s)
Retreat from Afghanistan comes with the biggest economic decline in the history of the West. Hopefully the Afghan retreat comes with the collapse of the house of cards called the EU as the Russian retreat from Afghanistan triggered the collapse of the USSR.
AndyBaxter
#6 Posted : 20 December 2012 07:22:44(UTC)
AndyBaxter

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 79
Man
United Kingdom
Location: North East

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Originally Posted by: rhaan Go to Quoted Post
Hopefully the Afghan retreat comes with the collapse of the house of cards called the EU as the Russian retreat from Afghanistan triggered the collapse of the USSR.


Interesting parallel, however the withdrawal of USSR military forces from Afghanistan – agreed in March 1988 and completed by February 1989 was done well before the fall of the ‘Berlin Wall’ in November 1989.

The Soviet leadership was unprepared for the Western backlash to their ‘invasion’. Afghanistan was always seen by Russia as being within its ‘sphere of influence’ and the invasion was seen as nothing more than internal politics by many in the Soviet hierarchy to counter the rise of Taraki in April 1978 which evidently took the Kremlin by surprise who moved then to protect a client regime he sought to replace. However 1979 was also the year of the fall of the Shah in what is now Iran. And do not forget the USA was also still smarting from its loss of prestige with its pull out from Vietnam in 1975.

So not really a parallel at all is it? Although I agree with your sentiment of the collapse of the EU. But again if this were to happen say economically via the collapse of the Euro or perhaps Britain’s withdrawal under article 50 creating a domino effect this would be worthy of further analysis methinks Dr. North?

For the history buffs:

Gorbachev’s decision to pull out of Afghanistan was primarily motivated by a desire to reach an accommodation with the West, although growing internal pressure was an important factor too.

Afghanistan just like it is today for ISAF (and the political support behind it) was proving to be a quagmire, an endless drain of resources, while mounting Soviet casualties were arousing growing discontent at home. Gorbachev, representative of the younger, technocratic wing of the Soviet bureaucracy, wanted a rapprochement with ‘the West’ to allow himself space for his top-down attempt to reform the outmoded Stalinist apparatus.

In reality, it was too late. Such was the depth and extent of the decay of the economy, brought about bureaucratic mismanagement and the corruption of the ruling elite, the ‘nomenklatura’, all attempts to modernise the system from within were doomed to failure.

It was soon to become abundantly clear, with the fall of the Berlin wall that November; that the bureaucratic system of Stalinism could no longer assure even the most basic social needs - economic growth, full employment and elementary social protection - within the Soviet Union or the satellite states of Eastern Europe. Is it any wonder, in this light, that the Soviet leadership abandoned Najibullah (whom they replaced Babrak Karmal with in 1986 with) to his gruesome fate?

“Afghan President Hamid Karzai is mocked again and again as mayor of Kabul” may just experience a similar fate perhaps!

What sickens me to the core being a former soldier is the utter futile waste of men women and materiel and the long term damage to morale of our armed forces. 438 dead and countless thousands wounded and even more psychologically damaged AND FOR WHAT????

Politicians never learn the lessons of history even when they are within living memory. For when they have POWER they use it for their ends.

I’ll leave you with some quotes from Soviet Soldiers of the time.

"I am convinced of one thing. That it is irresponsible to forget about lessons like Afghanistan," Lieutenant General Boris Gromov.

"They'll send more in and they'll lose more,"
Andrei Bandarenko, a former Soviet Spetsnatz special forces officer.

"What does Obama [the US president] know about the situation on the ground?"

"You can't put a soldier outside every house or a base on every mountain. We saw it ourselves, the more troops, the more resistance,"
Shamil Tyukteyev.

There are 438 reasons why The Harrogate Agenda must succeed; for Afghanistan nor Iraq would NEVER have been allowed to happen had we had POWER to control our politicians, we owe it to dead the injured, and their families to succeed.

Edited by user 20 December 2012 07:29:41(UTC)  | Reason: E&O

 3 users thanked AndyBaxter for this useful post.
TheBoilingFrog on 20/12/2012(UTC), Ravenscar on 20/12/2012(UTC), john in cheshire on 20/12/2012(UTC)
richard
#7 Posted : 20 December 2012 08:50:16(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,036
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Ravenscar Go to Quoted Post
Hasn't someone told Dave, pulling the troops out ain't easy 4000 miles from Blighty and in a landlocked country, surrounded as it is by people and nations hostile to anything remotely to do with namely Western but particularly British Armed forces.

The fun has only just started.



Getting the troops out is relatively easy. The real difficulty is getting all their equipment out. That is going to be slow and expensive.

ALeatherland
#8 Posted : 20 December 2012 15:48:30(UTC)
ALeatherland

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 12
United Kingdom

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Is it me or does this announcement seem a bit, well, sudden?

I was wondering if someone wants their troops back home so that they can ready them for an alternate deployment in an increasingly fractious part of the world.
richard
#9 Posted : 20 December 2012 17:41:07(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,036
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ALeatherland Go to Quoted Post
Is it me or does this announcement seem a bit, well, sudden?

I was wondering if someone wants their troops back home so that they can ready them for an alternate deployment in an increasingly fractious part of the world.



More like, they have redundancy awaiting them. Osborne wants the money for other things. Keeping troops in Afghanistan isn't going to win any votes, and most people have written off the war as a failure. Thus, it makes complete sense for Cameron to cut his losses.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.200 seconds.