EURef Forum
»
Blog Comments
»
Blog
»
EU politics: no voice without the EU
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,036 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
A confused and confusing piece in The Times by Berlin correspondent David Charter tells us that the UK recently attracted a ferocious outburst from Wolfgang Schäuble, who declared that Britain was leaving itself with "no voice in Europe". He made what are said to be "unguarded remarks" at a private dinner in front of the British Ambassador, reflecting the "rising frustration" from Germany at the calls from London for more concessions and a looser relationship with the EU. However, one has to take these earnest "revelations” with a pinch of salt, as sentiment rarely exists in isolation. Any remarks made by public figures have to be read in the context of the prevailing mood music. View full article here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/12/2012(UTC) Posts: 138
Thanks: 2 times Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 11 post(s)
|
Yes if I was a senior German politician I would also be concerned about the prospect of the UK leaving the EU. Our net contribution to the EU budget is estimated at £10 billion a year, who would make up the shortfall? France? There is also our trading deficit of £4 billion a month. The last thing German industry needs is any slowdown in that. Never mind ,no matter how strong a hand the FCO and our politicians have they also have a knack of grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 70 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Worcestershire Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
|
With the Times article and this from the Telegraph it can mean only one thing. http://www.telegraph.co....n-of-EU-is-fantasy.html
Dave is off to Brussels for the EU Council of Ministers Christmas Party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,036 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Robertm  to be fed a cup of hemlock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,036 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: James102  Yes if I was a senior German politician I would also be concerned about the prospect of the UK leaving the EU. Our net contribution to the EU budget is estimated at £10 billion a year, who would make up the shortfall? France? There is also our trading deficit of £4 billion a month. The last thing German industry needs is any slowdown in that. Never mind ,no matter how strong a hand the FCO and our politicians have they also have a knack of grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory.
Even if the UK left, I can see a deal being agreed where we pay transitional contributions to the EU. But with the UK out, Germany's position is strengthened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 381 Location: Albion
Thanks: 3 times Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 51 post(s)
|
richard wrote:Convenient it was that an unattributable source managed to hear this message and convey it to The Times. What a tragedy it would have been if we had missed it. What tragedy if the persons behind this kind of insidious attempt to 'influence the debate' were nonchalantly stabbed in the back by an someone playing them at their own game as he passed them casually on the street and strolled off with not a care in the world. Just like that. Wanna be a shit? Fine, have it your way. It's just a pity there's a law against it. OT: BBC TV news last night: It was a cold day; a dog bit a man; London is the first region in which natives Britons have now become a minority; Christmas retail sales are up, or was it down; it's gonna be frosty tonight. And it's goodnight from me. Goodnight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 134
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 10 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Robertm  The British media would report thusly: EU Summit - Dave vetoes Merkel under the mistletoe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 194 ![Germany Germany]() Location: Xanten Thanks: 3 times Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 14 post(s)
|
Nice article about the EU and NATO at the Asian Times: THE ROVING EYE NATO aims for a Nobel war prize By Pepe Escobar: http://www.atimes.com/at...Front_Page/NL13Aa01.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/12/2012(UTC) Posts: 138
Thanks: 2 times Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 11 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: richard  [quote=James102;7413]
Even if the UK left, I can see a deal being agreed where we pay transitional contributions to the EU. But with the UK out, Germany's position is strengthened.
Yes, defeat from the jaws of victory, we will no doubt continue to pay without it being necessary. I don’t suppose Tescos pays its suppliers and we are their customers to the tune of £48 odd billion a year ----without our contributions (obvious and disguised).Maybe they would prefer not to sell their goods to us. I can’t think of anything we can’t get somewhere else. Germany’s position is awkward as it is the EU’s pay master and with the Netherlands will be expected to make up the UK’s contribution. We think of Germany as a very rich country because GDP is used rather than GDP per capita---the German people may not feel very rich. The Euro is far from out of the mire and some economists have been crunching the numbers and have come up with the theory that Italy would benefit most from leaving. Someone may tell the Italians. German demographics also indicate the country will inevitably decline within a decade or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 922 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Sunderland Thanks: 76 times Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Quote:The authors of the Van Rompuy paper were particularly criticised for putting in a lot of thought to things like a banking union, fiscal union and a common economic policy, but to the question of a "strengthening democratic legitimacy and accountability", only eight lines were devoted. They were trying to bolt the stable door after the horse had bolted.....and do it quickly.Democratic accountability never figured in any of that in the past,so why break the habit?Besides most folk could not give a stuff.....ask anyone off the street. But if I was to make a start on doing this it is exactly where Id start too.Sharing banking and having a proper money union is fundamental to the whole project.Without control of the money you have nothing but a very leaky bucket.Merkel wants tougher controls and all this "consultation" business is a way of testing the water.Will the other EZ member states agree to hand over control of their money supply(i.e to the ECB/ESM?) along with tax and spend decisions and relegate themselves to mere provinces?My guess is if not, Germany will not progress with the project.Its either her way or the highway. The UK does not even figure on the radar at the moment.She needs to consolidate power within the EZ first,then worry about how it all will hang with the non EZ members...if they are still around by then. The German current discussions on the banking union are key.The Germans only want the larger banks covered yet as far as I can tell, this is to allow the smaller and weaker regional German banks to carry on without having to raise capital buffers.A lot of politicians have interests in these localised banks and they are fundamental to how German business/finance runs,mainly at quite a regional level.The last thing they want is exposure to higher banking standards that may well result in the closure of some of these banks and the end to regional influences.This seems a tad hypocritical as they are willing to hold Spanish/Greek banks open to scrutiny but not their own.A case of do as I say not as I do.Naturally,the likes of Hollande have been sticking their heels in over this and insisting the German banks come under the jurisdiction of any new banking authority.The Germans will likely have to relent,but it will be interesting to see how these discussions conclude today. Edited by user 12 December 2012 13:49:18(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 264 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Somerset Thanks: 5 times Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 24 post(s)
|
For the EU not to unravel they need us to stay on board as they do Greece and Spain etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 922 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Sunderland Thanks: 76 times Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Niall Warry  For the EU not to unravel they need us to stay on board as they do Greece and Spain etc.
Id say Greece and Spain are more important than the UK at present.If they leave the euro it is effectively over,they can stand the UK dithering on the edges for the time being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 617 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: gloucestershire Thanks: 4 times Was thanked: 66 time(s) in 54 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: vincent  Originally Posted by: Niall Warry  For the EU not to unravel they need us to stay on board as they do Greece and Spain etc.
Id say Greece and Spain are more important than the UK at present.If they leave the euro it is effectively over,they can stand the UK dithering on the edges for the time being. Mixed feelings probably. Seeing the UK OUT. Glad to have a stone removed from their shoe and things simplified. The UK is nuisance country in many ways, dragging its heels and wanting special treatment. Never an easy fit. Not part of the Euro and not likely to be any time soon. Keeping the UK IN. Being distracted with arranging the exit when they have enough to do. Avoiding a step change for the EU, which has thought only of the ratchet and expansion, with countries such as Turkey wanting to join the exclusive club. The idea that it doesn't continue and grow and a member sees benefits in being out of it is a rejection at an emotional level. A member leaving the EU or the Eurozone is destabilising the whole project. A sinking feeling that the UK could take off like a rocket, out of the EU. I'd guess they want us to stay in, but they're not prepared to make special concessions, in fact they can't make special concessions. The question of the EU seems to be moving away from staying in and more towards renegotiate within, or out. However, the Tories can't start to explain how renegotiating a new relationship within the EU is going to be done. The Colleagues aren't being very helpful and they are telling them the "have the penny and the bun" option they are trying to peddle, just isn't there. Edited by user 12 December 2012 14:33:26(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/12/2012(UTC) Posts: 138
Thanks: 2 times Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 11 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: comet  [quote=vincent;7426][quote=Niall Warry;7425] The UK is nuisance country in many ways, dragging its heels and wanting special treatment. Never an easy fit. Not part of the Euro and not likely to be any time soon.
Keeping the UK IN.
Being distracted with arranging the exit when they have enough to do.
. Ignoring for the moment the economic advantages to the Franco-Germans of keeping the UK in and contributing both directly and as a large market for them, there is also the historical problem of having Britain as an alternative model detached from the continent. To the idealists, who see a united federal Europe as the goal, it is this alternative model that must be considered the greater risk. Freed from the EU we are likely to drift back to a much more Anglosphere economic model. All this talk about Norway and needing to adopt EU regulations is nonsense. We trade with the so-called Single Market like we trade with Japan. Regulations would only affect exports to the EU.Anyway they trade much more with us, where our regulations would be in force, than we trade with them, hense our massive trade deficit. It is not the continental Europeans we need to fear but our own political class and Mandarinate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 922 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Sunderland Thanks: 76 times Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: comet 
I'd guess they want us to stay in, but they're not prepared to make special concessions, in fact they can't make special concessions. The question of the EU seems to be moving away from staying in and more towards renegotiate within, or out. However, the Tories can't start to explain how renegotiating a new relationship within the EU is going to be done. The Colleagues aren't being very helpful and they are telling them the "have the penny and the bun" option they are trying to peddle, just isn't there.
I don't think we can assume they would not be prepared to make special concessions.Once Merkel gets everyone on board and the 17 EZ states become as one,they still have to work out how they would deal with the rest of the non EZ nations. Could it be that the EU could then have a United States of Europe (representing the 17) with the rest of the 10 non EZ states?....11 members in all.That would play havoc with the majority voting rights,so where all this is leading god only knows. It 's all getting very messy. Edited by user 12 December 2012 16:32:04(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 163 Location: None
Thanks: 31 times Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
But of course we cannot have a voice, Dr. N!! The entity is clearly run by something called "Wolfgang Schäuble" --- even if we were interested in knowing what it was, we couldn't pronounce it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 73 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Yorkshire Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 4 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: richard  Originally Posted by: Robertm  to be fed a cup of hemlock? It's the Diazepam we will be fed upon his 'return' that we should worry about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 617 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: gloucestershire Thanks: 4 times Was thanked: 66 time(s) in 54 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: vincent  Originally Posted by: comet 
I'd guess they want us to stay in, but they're not prepared to make special concessions, in fact they can't make special concessions. The question of the EU seems to be moving away from staying in and more towards renegotiate within, or out. However, the Tories can't start to explain how renegotiating a new relationship within the EU is going to be done. The Colleagues aren't being very helpful and they are telling them the "have the penny and the bun" option they are trying to peddle, just isn't there.
I don't think we can assume they would not be prepared to make special concessions.Once Merkel gets everyone on board and the 17 EZ states become as one,they still have to work out how they would deal with the rest of the non EZ nations. Could it be that the EU could then have a United States of Europe (representing the 17) with the rest of the 10 non EZ states?....11 members in all.That would play havoc with the majority voting rights,so where all this is leading god only knows. It 's all getting very messy. Given their demonstrated capacity for bending the rules, a grudging yes. On the other hand, how's it to be done while even remotely sticking to the existing framework? If special pleading is allowed for the UK, and a general view would be that we've already gotten away with a lot of special pleading, it's a torrent of special pleading, especially for the non-EZ states. I assume that most of the non-EZ countries could usually be bribed or coerced into going along with the inner circle. They mostly have a commitment to join the EZ. A lot depends on the fortunes of the Euro, and while reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated, it certainly isn't out of the woods yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 922 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Sunderland Thanks: 76 times Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: comet  Originally Posted by: vincent  Originally Posted by: comet 
I'd guess they want us to stay in, but they're not prepared to make special concessions, in fact they can't make special concessions. The question of the EU seems to be moving away from staying in and more towards renegotiate within, or out. However, the Tories can't start to explain how renegotiating a new relationship within the EU is going to be done. The Colleagues aren't being very helpful and they are telling them the "have the penny and the bun" option they are trying to peddle, just isn't there.
I don't think we can assume they would not be prepared to make special concessions.Once Merkel gets everyone on board and the 17 EZ states become as one,they still have to work out how they would deal with the rest of the non EZ nations. Could it be that the EU could then have a United States of Europe (representing the 17) with the rest of the 10 non EZ states?....11 members in all.That would play havoc with the majority voting rights,so where all this is leading god only knows. It 's all getting very messy. Given their demonstrated capacity for bending the rules, a grudging yes. On the other hand, how's it to be done while even remotely sticking to the existing framework? If special pleading is allowed for the UK, and a general view would be that we've already gotten away with a lot of special pleading, it's a torrent of special pleading, especially for the non-EZ states. I assume that most of the non-EZ countries could usually be bribed or coerced into going along with the inner circle. They mostly have a commitment to join the EZ. A lot depends on the fortunes of the Euro, and while reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated, it certainly isn't out of the woods yet. I suppose if we get to that stage the euro will still be around and likely be more attractive to the rest of the non EZ states.Sweden is standing by Osborne.....well today anyway....on not joining the banking union.If a state does not want to join a banking union I cannot ever see them ever joining the euro so where is the EU momentum going here?....we are maybe getting toward a watershed moment....albeit in "EU time".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 148 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: EU East Midlands Region of the former UK Thanks: 47 times Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
When they have got their 17 sorted out, they'll be back for the stragglers.
And the Establishment will welcome them with open arms.
It's time to frame that fiver and hang it on your wall as a memento. |
Please hold: your call is important to us. |
|
|
|
|
|
EURef Forum
»
Blog Comments
»
Blog
»
EU politics: no voice without the EU
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.