EURef Forum
»
Blog Comments
»
Blog
»
EU politics: "fax law" – a tired old canard
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,039 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
"I think it is worth understanding what leaving [the EU] would involve", says David Cameron, then offering us a completely false scenario which does nothing other than demonstrate his own lack of understanding. Speaking to a brief straight out of the Open Europe book of lies he tells us that "there is the Norway option". "You can be like Norway", he says, "and you can have full access to the single market but you have absolutely no say over the rules of that market". Cameron was speaking at a lunch organised by the Parliamentary Press Gallery in Westminster saying he was in favour of staying in the EU because of its single market. But, he said, if the UK pulled out of the EU but wanted to keep the advantages of the single market it would be reduced to the standing of Norway, which has to abide by faxed orders from Brussels bureaucrats. View full article here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 163 Location: None
Thanks: 31 times Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
Lord, I wish there were some way to get rid of these unspeakable insults to the British people--- by which I mean first Camoron. Why on earth we bow down and pay any of them anything is a mystery to me. There has to be a way to cut the costs even as we cut ourselves loose.
Oh, by the way, Dr. N. I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out to the not-so-stupid British "plebs." Banksy is an interesting example. Just wondering if any of them have any (unofficial) connections to, sympathy with, or awareness of, the Harrogate Agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 79  ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: North East Thanks: 30 times Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: euSSR Go Home  Oh, by the way, Dr. N. I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out to the not-so-stupid British "plebs." Banksy is an interesting example. Just wondering if any of them have any (unofficial) connections to, sympathy with, or awareness of, the Harrogate Agenda.
indeed....some sterling work is going on behind the scenes on some interesting projects by some imaginative people.......watch out......watch out....! more intellectual than artistic I'd say at this stage but progress is happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 155 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Andover Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)
|
Can you remind me Richard what being in the EEA means. I forget whether the EEA rules apply to all trade even intra the member nation or just the trade between the nation and the EU. I'm sure you have see this: http://www.brugesgroup.com/EFTAorTheEU.pdfEdited by user 11 December 2012 07:59:35(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,039 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: stuart  Can you remind me Richard what being in the EEA means. I forget whether the EEA rules apply to all trade even intra the member nation or just the trade between the nation and the EU. I'm sure you have see this: http://www.brugesgroup.com/EFTAorTheEU.pdf As far as I understand, EEA rules also apply to internal markets. EEA members are obliged to integrate the rules into their national laws. Thanks for the link ... I've included it in the post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 84 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: york Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
|
EUSSR ". I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out"
Apart from some welcome Graffiti you could do worse than look at Rifleman 1853's very robust letter indeed to Cameron on Orphans of Liberty site today. Just the sort of language even he should be able to understand. And that's only Part 1! A heart warming read - in fact it deserves the widest possible circulation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 924 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Sunderland Thanks: 76 times Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Trevor Kavanagh was also at it yesterday in the "peoples paper". Quote:David Cameron has at last worked out how to deal with Europe.He will start next month by setting out the powers he wants back from Brussels.The UK will stay in the single market,but cut loose from the EU over food,fisheries,employment laws and human rights.Brussels may well agree.
Once that's sorted the PM will call a referendum on whether we agree to this semi-detatched relationship or pull out altogether.Where on earth does that leave Labour?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,039 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: vincent  Trevor Kavanagh was also at it yesterday in the "peoples paper". Quote:David Cameron has at last worked out how to deal with Europe.He will start next month by setting out the powers he wants back from Brussels.The UK will stay in the single market,but cut loose from the EU over food,fisheries,employment laws and human rights.Brussels may well agree.
Once that's sorted the PM will call a referendum on whether we agree to this semi-detatched relationship or pull out altogether.Where on earth does that leave Labour? "Brussels may well agree". And if "Brussels" doesn't agree ... what then? In fact, "Brussels" mean all the other 26 member states agreeing ... any one has a veto. And that is supposing that there is a majority agreement for treaty change to be discussed ... and that such a change does not require a convention. Kavanagh, I fear, is talking out of his backside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 241 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Thanks: 18 times Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 11 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ELF  I’ve hesitated to post this, as I wanted to read back through the blog and think harder about it before doing so. But, I’m wondering whether the exit-via-Art. 50 agenda would benefit from a few bullet points, each with the explanatory paragraph, as was done at the start of the HA process? E.g.
1. what is wrong with sudden uncontrolled exit (a la UKIP) 2. how Art 50 works 3. what does proposed membership of EEA/EFTA mean 4. a refutation of rule-by-fax objection 5. what would immediately changed (for the good) 6. a proposed process for the subsequent national debate on what relationship the country wants with “Europe”
Originally Posted by: richard  Yes ... and that is a good structure to work with. Originally Posted by: Clarence  So, basically, it's an outright lie. Is the following condensed to the point of being inaccurate ? Quote: This simply isn't true. Experts from Norway and other EEA/EFTA countries participate in over 500 committees expert groups at European level. Additionally, much international policy is initiated at the global level, for example by UN committees. In both cases the he EU simply acts as the middle-man. The UK input is then weakened by the need to be part of an agreed EU policy, often Franco-German driven.
I'd suggest that the supra-regional point is vital, to pre-empt any counter that the 600 is nothing against thousands of EU committees and expert groups that exclude Fax law was possibly the most predictable objection. But maybe point 4 should be more generic, covering the handful of main objections that they will try ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,039 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ELF  Originally Posted by: ELF  I’ve hesitated to post this, as I wanted to read back through the blog and think harder about it before doing so. But, I’m wondering whether the exit-via-Art. 50 agenda would benefit from a few bullet points, each with the explanatory paragraph, as was done at the start of the HA process? E.g.
1. what is wrong with sudden uncontrolled exit (a la UKIP) 2. how Art 50 works 3. what does proposed membership of EEA/EFTA mean 4. a refutation of rule-by-fax objection 5. what would immediately changed (for the good) 6. a proposed process for the subsequent national debate on what relationship the country wants with “Europe”
Originally Posted by: richard  Yes ... and that is a good structure to work with. Originally Posted by: Clarence  So, basically, it's an outright lie. Is the following condensed to the point of being inaccurate ? Quote: This simply isn't true. Experts from Norway and other EEA/EFTA countries participate in over 500 committees expert groups at European level. Additionally, much international policy is initiated at the global level, for example by UN committees. In both cases the he EU simply acts as the middle-man. The UK input is then weakened by the need to be part of an agreed EU policy, often Franco-German driven.
I'd suggest that the supra-regional point is vital, to pre-empt any counter that the 600 is nothing against thousands of EU committees and expert groups that exclude Fax law was possibly the most predictable objection. But maybe point 4 should be more generic, covering the handful of main objections that they will try ? Yes ... that's quite a good summary ... we can add and refine but that is an admirable starting point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/12/2012(UTC) Posts: 30 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Thanks: 41 times Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: graham wood  EUSSR ". I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out"
Apart from some welcome Graffiti you could do worse than look at Rifleman 1853's very robust letter indeed to Cameron on Orphans of Liberty site today. Just the sort of language even he should be able to understand. And that's only Part 1! A heart warming read - in fact it deserves the widest possible circulation. Graham, will you please post a link - I've googled it but no luck. No, it's okay I've found it. Excellent, thank you. Edited by user 11 December 2012 11:36:56(UTC)
| Reason: found link
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 76 ![Greece Greece]() Location: Corfu Thanks: 43 times Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
http://www.4liberty.org..../open-letter-to-cameron/Just in case anyone else is having a problem here's the link.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,039 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: aster  Originally Posted by: graham wood  EUSSR ". I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out"
Apart from some welcome Graffiti you could do worse than look at Rifleman 1853's very robust letter indeed to Cameron on Orphans of Liberty site today. Just the sort of language even he should be able to understand. And that's only Part 1! A heart warming read - in fact it deserves the widest possible circulation. Graham, will you please post a link - I've googled it but no luck. No, it's okay I've found it. Excellent, thank you. http://4liberty.org.uk/2.../open-letter-to-cameron/I beg to differ ... it is a pathetic, ill-informed rant. Do you really think this will recover the high ground?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/08/2012(UTC) Posts: 264 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 19 post(s)
|
An excellent debunking as usual.
If that is the Green Tosser's best shot then we have little to fear. As others have said and ignorieing the good Doc's points, trying to argue that we will end up like Switzerland or Norway is just so stupid, as everyone knows how well off and rich they are, whereas all one sees looking at the EU is poverty and misery. which is guaranteed under all past EU performance, to get far, far worse.
The man is a first class dolt....but we all know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 924 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Sunderland Thanks: 76 times Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Quote:Crucially, the essence of this is that most of the single market rules are negotiated at global and regional level. What is decided at this level cannot be changed - the EU is the middle-man, turning what are called "diqules" into actionable law.
As an example of that principle in action the government has been pushing for higher bank equity buffers for a while now,going further than even the Basel agreements,(and EU),So for Cameron to claim this is all faxed in from Brussels is a non starter. Quote:The ICB also advised that capital requirements be raised to limit risk. For some time now, the government has been pushing the EU to go further than the Basel III protocals. It intends that British banks should have an equity-to-capital ratio of 10 per cent, in line with the ICB’s report. http://blogs.spectator.c...tiveness-and-confidence/Quote:"The White Paper proposals are far reaching, but on some points – such as limits on the leverage of big banks – we believe they should go further."
Last September the ICB said that the UK's biggest banks should have a minimum level of capital in relation to assets of 4 per cent, more than required under the international Basel rules, which have set a target of 3 per cent. http://www.independent.c...sborne-told-7852111.htmlAlthough it is still not enough to stop the banking system running amok again come the next recovery(another issue really), it does show Cameron is not even aware of what is going on in his own country,and on an issue close to his heart.......The City. Edited by user 11 December 2012 12:40:13(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 84 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: york Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
|
Richard: "I beg to differ ... it is a pathetic, ill-informed rant. Do you really think this will recover the high ground?" I assume you meant Rifleman's and not Cameron's? (joking) But don't be so churlish Richard. Of course its a good old fashioned rant and not meant to be an intellectual lecture on the pros and cons of LibCon policy in any depth? Ill informed? Not really I think - he seems to articulate in populist language what a great number of people actually feel. I understand when a guy feels so angry he feel he must get it off his chest. Farage rants too as we all well know, but that is why he is generally popular and gets listened to in some measure - he populises the realist case. Is'nt there a place for "high ground" political and intellectual presentation of the case against the EU and the rant as well? Hitchens is often another ranter - but can be very powerful when he excoriates the Tories.
|
 1 user thanked graham wood for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,039 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: graham wood  Richard: "I beg to differ ... it is a pathetic, ill-informed rant. Do you really think this will recover the high ground?" I assume you meant Rifleman's and not Cameron's? (joking) But don't be so churlish Richard. Of course its a good old fashioned rant and not meant to be an intellectual lecture on the pros and cons of LibCon policy in any depth? Ill informed? Not really I think - he seems to articulate in populist language what a great number of people actually feel. I understand when a guy feels so angry he feel he must get it off his chest. Farage rants too as we all well know, but that is why he is generally popular and gets listened to in some measure - he populises the realist case. Is'nt there a place for "high ground" political and intellectual presentation of the case against the EU and the rant as well? Hitchens is often another ranter - but can be very powerful when he excoriates the Tories. Why am I being churlish? It is an ill-informed rant - is calling a spade a spade churlish?. What is the point ... what does it achieve, and how does it help? Surely, the more effective line is, forensically to demolish the claims made by Cameron? As for Farage, WTF has he actually achieved?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC) Posts: 81 ![Germany Germany]() Location: Hamburg Thanks: 28 times Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)
|
What is needed is a Professor of history to lead UK (not alone ) politics, then if he/she makes mistakes they will be new ones, reading on the net quotes by PLATO (425 BC ) nothing has changed in the political world in 2,500 years, politicians held degrees in stupid 2,500 years ago, the only difference is today they have honors !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Registered, Administrators Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 3,039 ![United Kingdom United Kingdom]() Location: Bradford Thanks: 97 times Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Nottoobrite 
What is needed is a Professor of history to lead UK (not alone ) politics, then if he/she makes mistakes they will be new ones, reading on the net quotes by PLATO (425 BC ) nothing has changed in the political world in 2,500 years, politicians held degrees in stupid 2,500 years ago, the only difference is today they have honors !
They got honours then, methinks, and the critics hemlock. But the point you make is a good one. Cameron in particular, holds a degree in stupid. It is quite distressing that a prime minister of this land knows so little about how law is made. But that gives us our opening - we need to expose his ignorance and stupidity ... not match it with a dose of our own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/12/2012(UTC) Posts: 138
Thanks: 2 times Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
I think you are being too kind to put Cameron’s comments down to ignorance. It is like the “Trade” comments that fail to mention we have a monthly trading deficit of £4 billion-plus and that the EU’s sales to the UK are worth £16 billion a month, why would the EU stop trading with us if we were to withdraw? There are also hidden costs such as customs duties from ships and aircraft using British ports. The expense scandals show the ethical standards of our political class and with the amount of unaccountable money available to the EU one wonders if they have decided to cut out the electorate and just buy up our politicians.
|
 1 user thanked James102 for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
EURef Forum
»
Blog Comments
»
Blog
»
EU politics: "fax law" – a tired old canard
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.