logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
richard
#1 Posted : 10 December 2012 23:31:44(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
"I think it is worth understanding what leaving [the EU] would involve", says David Cameron, then offering us a completely false scenario which does nothing other than demonstrate his own lack of understanding.

Speaking to a brief straight out of the Open Europe book of lies he tells us that "there is the Norway option". "You can be like Norway", he says, "and you can have full access to the single market but you have absolutely no say over the rules of that market".

Cameron was speaking at a lunch organised by the Parliamentary Press Gallery in Westminster saying he was in favour of staying in the EU because of its single market. But, he said, if the UK pulled out of the EU but wanted to keep the advantages of the single market it would be reduced to the standing of Norway, which has to abide by faxed orders from Brussels bureaucrats.

View full article here
euSSR Go Home
#2 Posted : 11 December 2012 03:58:10(UTC)
euSSR Go Home

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 163
Location: None

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Lord, I wish there were some way to get rid of these unspeakable insults to the British people--- by which I mean first Camoron. Why on earth we bow down and pay any of them anything is a mystery to me. There has to be a way to cut the costs even as we cut ourselves loose.

Oh, by the way, Dr. N. I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out to the not-so-stupid British "plebs." Banksy is an interesting example. Just wondering if any of them have any (unofficial) connections to, sympathy with, or awareness of, the Harrogate Agenda.
AndyBaxter
#3 Posted : 11 December 2012 07:00:54(UTC)
AndyBaxter

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 79
Man
United Kingdom
Location: North East

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Originally Posted by: euSSR Go Home Go to Quoted Post

Oh, by the way, Dr. N. I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out to the not-so-stupid British "plebs." Banksy is an interesting example. Just wondering if any of them have any (unofficial) connections to, sympathy with, or awareness of, the Harrogate Agenda.


indeed....some sterling work is going on behind the scenes on some interesting projects by some imaginative people.......watch out......watch out....! more intellectual than artistic I'd say at this stage but progress is happening.

stuart
#4 Posted : 11 December 2012 07:40:22(UTC)
stuart

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 155
United Kingdom
Location: Andover

Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Can you remind me Richard what being in the EEA means. I forget whether the EEA rules apply to all trade even intra the member nation or just the trade between the nation and the EU.

I'm sure you have see this:

http://www.brugesgroup.com/EFTAorTheEU.pdf

Edited by user 11 December 2012 07:59:35(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

richard
#5 Posted : 11 December 2012 08:35:46(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: stuart Go to Quoted Post
Can you remind me Richard what being in the EEA means. I forget whether the EEA rules apply to all trade even intra the member nation or just the trade between the nation and the EU.

I'm sure you have see this:

http://www.brugesgroup.com/EFTAorTheEU.pdf




As far as I understand, EEA rules also apply to internal markets. EEA members are obliged to integrate the rules into their national laws.

Thanks for the link ... I've included it in the post.

graham wood
#6 Posted : 11 December 2012 09:03:55(UTC)
graham wood

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 84
United Kingdom
Location: york

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
EUSSR ". I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out"

Apart from some welcome Graffiti you could do worse than look at Rifleman 1853's very robust letter indeed to Cameron on Orphans of Liberty site today. Just the sort of language even he should be able to understand. And that's only Part 1!
A heart warming read - in fact it deserves the widest possible circulation.
vincent
#7 Posted : 11 December 2012 09:24:55(UTC)
vincent

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 924
United Kingdom
Location: Sunderland

Thanks: 76 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Trevor Kavanagh was also at it yesterday in the "peoples paper".

Quote:
David Cameron has at last worked out how to deal with Europe.He will start next month by setting out the powers he wants back from Brussels.The UK will stay in the single market,but cut loose from the EU over food,fisheries,employment laws and human rights.Brussels may well agree.

Once that's sorted the PM will call a referendum on whether we agree to this semi-detatched relationship or pull out altogether.Where on earth does that leave Labour?



richard
#8 Posted : 11 December 2012 09:29:47(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: vincent Go to Quoted Post
Trevor Kavanagh was also at it yesterday in the "peoples paper".

Quote:
David Cameron has at last worked out how to deal with Europe.He will start next month by setting out the powers he wants back from Brussels.The UK will stay in the single market,but cut loose from the EU over food,fisheries,employment laws and human rights.Brussels may well agree.

Once that's sorted the PM will call a referendum on whether we agree to this semi-detatched relationship or pull out altogether.Where on earth does that leave Labour?






"Brussels may well agree". And if "Brussels" doesn't agree ... what then?

In fact, "Brussels" mean all the other 26 member states agreeing ... any one has a veto. And that is supposing that there is a majority agreement for treaty change to be discussed ... and that such a change does not require a convention.

Kavanagh, I fear, is talking out of his backside.

ELF
#9 Posted : 11 December 2012 10:21:41(UTC)
ELF

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 241
United Kingdom

Thanks: 18 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 11 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ELF Go to Quoted Post
I’ve hesitated to post this, as I wanted to read back through the blog and think harder about it before doing so. But, I’m wondering whether the exit-via-Art. 50 agenda would benefit from a few bullet points, each with the explanatory paragraph, as was done at the start of the HA process? E.g.

1. what is wrong with sudden uncontrolled exit (a la UKIP)
2. how Art 50 works
3. what does proposed membership of EEA/EFTA mean
4. a refutation of rule-by-fax objection
5. what would immediately changed (for the good)
6. a proposed process for the subsequent national debate on what relationship the country wants with “Europe”

Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Yes ... and that is a good structure to work with.

Originally Posted by: Clarence Go to Quoted Post

There are several EU Ref posts with knock-down arguments for those six points. Here are a couple for (4):

http://eureferendum.blog.../05/fax-machine-law.html
http://eureferendum2.blo...07/03/success-of-eu.html
http://www.eureferendum....ogview.aspx?blogno=74741


Here's an argument against (1), the "one bound and he was free" option:

http://eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=69759

I'll try to dig out posts for the other points when I have a bit more time.


So, basically, it's an outright lie. Is the following condensed to the point of being inaccurate ?
Quote:

This simply isn't true. Experts from Norway and other EEA/EFTA countries participate in over 500 committees expert groups at European level. Additionally, much international policy is initiated at the global level, for example by UN committees. In both cases the he EU simply acts as the middle-man. The UK input is then weakened by the need to be part of an agreed EU policy, often Franco-German driven.


I'd suggest that the supra-regional point is vital, to pre-empt any counter that the 600 is nothing against thousands of EU committees and expert groups that exclude

Fax law was possibly the most predictable objection. But maybe point 4 should be more generic, covering the handful of main objections that they will try ?
richard
#10 Posted : 11 December 2012 10:24:53(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ELF Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: ELF Go to Quoted Post
I’ve hesitated to post this, as I wanted to read back through the blog and think harder about it before doing so. But, I’m wondering whether the exit-via-Art. 50 agenda would benefit from a few bullet points, each with the explanatory paragraph, as was done at the start of the HA process? E.g.

1. what is wrong with sudden uncontrolled exit (a la UKIP)
2. how Art 50 works
3. what does proposed membership of EEA/EFTA mean
4. a refutation of rule-by-fax objection
5. what would immediately changed (for the good)
6. a proposed process for the subsequent national debate on what relationship the country wants with “Europe”

Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Yes ... and that is a good structure to work with.

Originally Posted by: Clarence Go to Quoted Post

There are several EU Ref posts with knock-down arguments for those six points. Here are a couple for (4):

http://eureferendum.blog.../05/fax-machine-law.html
http://eureferendum2.blo...07/03/success-of-eu.html
http://www.eureferendum....ogview.aspx?blogno=74741


Here's an argument against (1), the "one bound and he was free" option:

http://eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=69759

I'll try to dig out posts for the other points when I have a bit more time.


So, basically, it's an outright lie. Is the following condensed to the point of being inaccurate ?
Quote:

This simply isn't true. Experts from Norway and other EEA/EFTA countries participate in over 500 committees expert groups at European level. Additionally, much international policy is initiated at the global level, for example by UN committees. In both cases the he EU simply acts as the middle-man. The UK input is then weakened by the need to be part of an agreed EU policy, often Franco-German driven.


I'd suggest that the supra-regional point is vital, to pre-empt any counter that the 600 is nothing against thousands of EU committees and expert groups that exclude

Fax law was possibly the most predictable objection. But maybe point 4 should be more generic, covering the handful of main objections that they will try ?



Yes ... that's quite a good summary ... we can add and refine but that is an admirable starting point.

aster
#11 Posted : 11 December 2012 11:34:09(UTC)
aster

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 30
United Kingdom

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Originally Posted by: graham wood Go to Quoted Post
EUSSR ". I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out"

Apart from some welcome Graffiti you could do worse than look at Rifleman 1853's very robust letter indeed to Cameron on Orphans of Liberty site today. Just the sort of language even he should be able to understand. And that's only Part 1!
A heart warming read - in fact it deserves the widest possible circulation.


Graham, will you please post a link - I've googled it but no luck.
No, it's okay I've found it. Excellent, thank you.

Edited by user 11 December 2012 11:36:56(UTC)  | Reason: found link

meltemian
#12 Posted : 11 December 2012 11:52:56(UTC)
meltemian

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 76
Greece
Location: Corfu

Thanks: 43 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 2 post(s)
http://www.4liberty.org..../open-letter-to-cameron/

Just in case anyone else is having a problem here's the link.
richard
#13 Posted : 11 December 2012 11:53:07(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: aster Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: graham wood Go to Quoted Post
EUSSR ". I've been looking over some of the Graffiti artwork just lately: it's a popular way that rebels can use for getting the message out"

Apart from some welcome Graffiti you could do worse than look at Rifleman 1853's very robust letter indeed to Cameron on Orphans of Liberty site today. Just the sort of language even he should be able to understand. And that's only Part 1!
A heart warming read - in fact it deserves the widest possible circulation.


Graham, will you please post a link - I've googled it but no luck.
No, it's okay I've found it. Excellent, thank you.



http://4liberty.org.uk/2.../open-letter-to-cameron/

I beg to differ ... it is a pathetic, ill-informed rant. Do you really think this will recover the high ground?
F U Fed Up
#14 Posted : 11 December 2012 12:18:49(UTC)
F U Fed Up

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/08/2012(UTC)
Posts: 264
United Kingdom

Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 19 post(s)
An excellent debunking as usual.

If that is the Green Tosser's best shot then we have little to fear. As others have said and ignorieing the good Doc's points, trying to argue that we will end up like Switzerland or Norway is just so stupid, as everyone knows how well off and rich they are, whereas all one sees looking at the EU is poverty and misery. which is guaranteed under all past EU performance, to get far, far worse.

The man is a first class dolt....but we all know that.

vincent
#15 Posted : 11 December 2012 12:39:14(UTC)
vincent

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 924
United Kingdom
Location: Sunderland

Thanks: 76 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Quote:
Crucially, the essence of this is that most of the single market rules are negotiated at global and regional level. What is decided at this level cannot be changed - the EU is the middle-man, turning what are called "diqules" into actionable law.



As an example of that principle in action the government has been pushing for higher bank equity buffers for a while now,going further than even the Basel agreements,(and EU),So for Cameron to claim this is all faxed in from Brussels is a non starter.

Quote:
The ICB also advised that capital requirements be raised to limit risk. For some time now, the government has been pushing the EU to go further than the Basel III protocals. It intends that British banks should have an equity-to-capital ratio of 10 per cent, in line with the ICB’s report.


http://blogs.spectator.c...tiveness-and-confidence/

Quote:
"The White Paper proposals are far reaching, but on some points – such as limits on the leverage of big banks – we believe they should go further."

Last September the ICB said that the UK's biggest banks should have a minimum level of capital in relation to assets of 4 per cent, more than required under the international Basel rules, which have set a target of 3 per cent.


http://www.independent.c...sborne-told-7852111.html


Although it is still not enough to stop the banking system running amok again come the next recovery(another issue really), it does show Cameron is not even aware of what is going on in his own country,and on an issue close to his heart.......The City.

Edited by user 11 December 2012 12:40:13(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

graham wood
#16 Posted : 11 December 2012 12:53:44(UTC)
graham wood

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 84
United Kingdom
Location: york

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
Richard: "I beg to differ ... it is a pathetic, ill-informed rant. Do you really think this will recover the high ground?"

I assume you meant Rifleman's and not Cameron's? (joking) But don't be so churlish Richard. Of course its a good old fashioned rant and not meant to be an intellectual lecture on the pros and cons of LibCon policy in any depth?
Ill informed? Not really I think - he seems to articulate in populist language what a great number of people actually feel.
I understand when a guy feels so angry he feel he must get it off his chest.

Farage rants too as we all well know, but that is why he is generally popular and gets listened to in some measure - he populises the realist case. Is'nt there a place for "high ground" political and intellectual presentation of the case against the EU and the rant as well? Hitchens is often another ranter - but can be very powerful when he excoriates the Tories.BigGrin
 1 user thanked graham wood for this useful post.
aster on 11/12/2012(UTC)
richard
#17 Posted : 11 December 2012 13:06:14(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: graham wood Go to Quoted Post
Richard: "I beg to differ ... it is a pathetic, ill-informed rant. Do you really think this will recover the high ground?"

I assume you meant Rifleman's and not Cameron's? (joking) But don't be so churlish Richard. Of course its a good old fashioned rant and not meant to be an intellectual lecture on the pros and cons of LibCon policy in any depth?
Ill informed? Not really I think - he seems to articulate in populist language what a great number of people actually feel.
I understand when a guy feels so angry he feel he must get it off his chest.

Farage rants too as we all well know, but that is why he is generally popular and gets listened to in some measure - he populises the realist case. Is'nt there a place for "high ground" political and intellectual presentation of the case against the EU and the rant as well? Hitchens is often another ranter - but can be very powerful when he excoriates the Tories.BigGrin



Why am I being churlish? It is an ill-informed rant - is calling a spade a spade churlish?. What is the point ... what does it achieve, and how does it help? Surely, the more effective line is, forensically to demolish the claims made by Cameron?

As for Farage, WTF has he actually achieved?

Nottoobrite
#18 Posted : 11 December 2012 15:11:06(UTC)
Nottoobrite

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 81
Germany
Location: Hamburg

Thanks: 28 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)


What is needed is a Professor of history to lead UK (not alone ) politics, then if he/she makes mistakes they will be new ones, reading on the net quotes by PLATO (425 BC ) nothing has changed in the political world in 2,500 years, politicians held degrees in stupid 2,500 years ago, the only difference is today they have honors !
richard
#19 Posted : 11 December 2012 15:34:50(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Nottoobrite Go to Quoted Post


What is needed is a Professor of history to lead UK (not alone ) politics, then if he/she makes mistakes they will be new ones, reading on the net quotes by PLATO (425 BC ) nothing has changed in the political world in 2,500 years, politicians held degrees in stupid 2,500 years ago, the only difference is today they have honors !



They got honours then, methinks, and the critics hemlock. But the point you make is a good one. Cameron in particular, holds a degree in stupid. It is quite distressing that a prime minister of this land knows so little about how law is made. But that gives us our opening - we need to expose his ignorance and stupidity ... not match it with a dose of our own.

James102
#20 Posted : 11 December 2012 16:35:36(UTC)
James102

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 138

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
I think you are being too kind to put Cameron’s comments down to ignorance. It is like the “Trade” comments that fail to mention we have a monthly trading deficit of £4 billion-plus and that the EU’s sales to the UK are worth £16 billion a month, why would the EU stop trading with us if we were to withdraw?
There are also hidden costs such as customs duties from ships and aircraft using British ports.
The expense scandals show the ethical standards of our political class and with the amount of unaccountable money available to the EU one wonders if they have decided to cut out the electorate and just buy up our politicians.
 1 user thanked James102 for this useful post.
Flashman on 11/12/2012(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.371 seconds.