logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
richard
#1 Posted : 10 December 2012 14:33:08(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,040
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
"I'm proud to be European", says Van Rompuy, picking up his ludicrous bauble in Oslo today. But, if he is entitled to that point of view, he has no right to impose it on anyone else. Nor indeed, in his acceptance speech, does Barroso have any right to speak on our behalf.

That much has most certainly percolated into the higher echelons of the British government, witness the absence of David Cameron from the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.

Instead, in a remarkable gesture of contempt, the tarnished europhile Nick Clegg has been sent, ostensibly to represent the United Kingdom. In fact, he represents only himself and a diminishing band of euro-enthusiasts, none of whom can command majority support in this country.

View full article here

 1 user thanked richard for this useful post.
aster on 10/12/2012(UTC)
aster
#2 Posted : 10 December 2012 15:03:59(UTC)
aster

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 30
United Kingdom

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Thanks Richard for a superb analysis.

Taking up the exchange between yourself and William Gruff, surely the existence of disparate groups seeking to implement the same agenda points to the lack of strong, effective leadership able to understand, grasp and use power effectively and usually ruthlessly.

Farage is not enough, but he is an enormous step in the right direction, I greatly admire his guts and his gob. His personal shortcomings will prevent UKIP from making the progress it could, but this is not his fault.

So far UKIP has failed to attract a sufficiently powerful individual to either challenge Farage for leadership, or to use his skills to obtain political dominance. Not Davies, not Fox as you say Richard, and now, sadly, not Gove. It looks like Cameron really is the best the Tories can do.

If the EU is not seriously worried about Farage’s UKIP, and the power of the voters he attracts, then they are plain nuts. There's no Farage to voice effective dissent to Merkel and Shuable, but then the Germans are doing very nicely, thank you - so far. This will not last, and the German instinct will be to preserve the dominant position gained by currency manipulation - once again, and probably at any cost.

The German's do not share Barrosso's proud idiotic claim to European nationality - like the Greeks, they believe some unpleasant things about the Portuguese, about most of the European nations, and about others aspiring to share Barrosso's European nationality - like, say, The Turks.

God, please send us a Churchill who cares about the British (not military glory) before there are none of us left.

Edited by user 10 December 2012 15:13:11(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

ELF
#3 Posted : 10 December 2012 15:04:52(UTC)
ELF

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 241
United Kingdom

Thanks: 18 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Quote:
Dr Fox will reinforce his reputation as "damaged goods", stating that Britain's position should be: "Back to the Common Market"

And his explanation of why "Back to the Common Market" does not equal EEA/EFTA is ... ?

permex
#4 Posted : 10 December 2012 15:04:59(UTC)
permex

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 117
Portugal
Location: North

Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Sometimes one cannot help but feel sick....& in the case of the Nobel Bauble the urge to puke is nigh on overwhelming.
Although it was debased decades ago, the Nobel commitee attempts to plumb even deeper, fumicolous depths by ennobling utter trash.
My thoughts are of those real people for whom the prize was intended and how they must feel placed beside some of the most dangerously criminal elements this World has recently produced.
The Nobel Peace Prize has become the badge of ignominy......time that the honest & decent recipients still extant returned their badges of shame to the septic donors.
graham wood
#5 Posted : 10 December 2012 15:36:31(UTC)
graham wood

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 84
United Kingdom
Location: york

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
"but with the prime minister embracing gay marriage "

Yes. If "Europe" does not sink this bovine in 2015, be sure that degrading marriage certainly will.
In fact it may well run as one of the defining issues in coming days as I understand from my MP that their postbags are bulging on this issue, and others report that Tories are leaving the party in droves in utter disgust. What else could this idiot expect?
AndyBaxter
#6 Posted : 10 December 2012 15:42:24(UTC)
AndyBaxter

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 79
Man
United Kingdom
Location: North East

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 12 post(s)
"There is thus a distinct possibility that the "UKIP effect", combined with the Lib-Dim refusal to agree to new constituency boundaries, will see a narrow Labour win in 2015, and even a Lab-Lib coalition."

if so then do not discount the possibility of the introduction of the Euro and ratification of the new treaty.

as I have said before, it is not beyond the realms of fantasty.



"The article in the Telegraph and the analysis are very illuminating.

I have a good look at his bio and looked at some of his recent speeches:

He seems to come across as a grounded in ‘real’ life man with considerable ‘real’ life experience outside the ‘bubble’.

His views on the EU are more realistic and more cynically honest than most, however given such he MUST know that article 50 is the only way to extricate ourselves both legitimately and with the minimum of disruption. Yet I can see no reference to such anywhere in his speeches articles or quotes!

That the EU is forging ahead with a new treaty has been well covered and apart from EU ref and other blogs who can see the logical consequence of such action (Britain is left on the outside) apart from this article where Owen Patterson acknowledges such there is no meaningful analysis of such in the MSM that I can see.

That Britain will be left ‘out in the cold’ when a new treaty is ratified, is obvious to those of us who follow matters EU. And that such a situation can only strengthen the ‘out’ decision IF a referendum offering such an option were to appear.

However no-one has contemplated the alternative: What if a Parliament ergo an Executive stuffed with Europhiles decided to integrate us further? Firstly by adopting the Euro and then becoming signatories to the new treaty that will emerge.

It is not beyond the realms of fantasy to contemplate such using arguments of being left out, having no say, being powerless to influence and that the EU is our only hope of economic salvation ad nauseum!

I think it is a scenario worthy of contemplation; never underestimate ones opponent, always think of countermoves 3 - 4moves ahead of their own. To dismiss such a move out of hand could be folly."

richard
#7 Posted : 10 December 2012 16:04:34(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,040
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: AndyBaxter Go to Quoted Post
...

His views on the EU are more realistic and more cynically honest than most, however given such he MUST know that article 50 is the only way to extricate ourselves both legitimately and with the minimum of disruption. Yet I can see no reference to such anywhere in his speeches articles or quotes!

...




Give it time.

thespecialone
#8 Posted : 10 December 2012 16:10:35(UTC)
thespecialone

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 203
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Gloucestershire

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Here is the latest newsletter I still receive from the Tories about what is going on in Europe

http://www.ashleyfoxmep....r_2012_-_Web_Version.pdf

If I remember correctly you did a piece on broadband to the countryside and the European Commission needing to agree. So even down to deciding that we should be spending taxpayers' money to give broadband to those who choose to live in rurual areas is out of parliament's hands.
JO
#9 Posted : 10 December 2012 16:34:32(UTC)
JO

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 55
United Kingdom
Location: Lincolnshire

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Richard wrote:

Quote:
"In the shorter term, though, there is little confidence in the Tory ranks that they will win the 2015 general election. It is possible that a robust speech on "Europe" by Cameron might claw back some hope, but with the prime minister embracing gay marriage and other issues inimical to the Tory Right, he is burning his bridges with some verve. Constituency activists are deserting him in their droves, with local parties in meltdown".


The Conservative party grassroots might be outraged, but I don't think the electorate in general are really all that bothered about gays getting married in church. Probably because most of the electorate don't go there anymore anyway! In short, they're indifferent. It's a none issue for most. In fact the whole 'gay' thing is a none issue. And Cameron will have known that.

Jo



vincent
#10 Posted : 10 December 2012 16:36:59(UTC)
vincent

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 925
United Kingdom
Location: Sunderland

Thanks: 76 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Quote:
Rumour now has it that Mr Cameron is definitely moving towards an "in-out" referendum, based on a choice between a renegotiated relationship between the EU, and complete withdrawal. Still, then, the debate is being distorted by framing it in terms of "either/or" when, in fact, the most realistic choice is "negotiate and withdraw".


Ooohh that's a bit of scary thought for a Tory.BigGrinHe seems intent on giving us just one last option to hang on in there.Does he seriously believe that he will get anything substantial from these "renegotiations" other than more political/economic unification.The EU and the world has moved on,Tory brains have not comprehended this yet....I find the ignorance staggering.
AndyBaxter
#11 Posted : 10 December 2012 16:46:35(UTC)
AndyBaxter

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 79
Man
United Kingdom
Location: North East

Thanks: 30 times
Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: AndyBaxter Go to Quoted Post
...

His views on the EU are more realistic and more cynically honest than most, however given such he MUST know that article 50 is the only way to extricate ourselves both legitimately and with the minimum of disruption. Yet I can see no reference to such anywhere in his speeches articles or quotes!

...




Give it time.



Ahhhh............all becomes clear now!!!!
F U Fed Up
#12 Posted : 10 December 2012 16:59:44(UTC)
F U Fed Up

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/08/2012(UTC)
Posts: 264
United Kingdom

Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 19 post(s)
No speech will save the Green Tosser, he is a busted flush many times over.

The tories have one chance left, dump the idle waster now and get a proper tory in, or face wipeout in the next election.

There will be no Lib-Lab coalition, as the Libs won't exist after the next election. Lab will win....and there will be a very large UKIP vote.
 1 user thanked F U Fed Up for this useful post.
Flashman on 10/12/2012(UTC)
richard
#13 Posted : 10 December 2012 17:34:58(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,040
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: JO Go to Quoted Post
Richard wrote:

Quote:
"In the shorter term, though, there is little confidence in the Tory ranks that they will win the 2015 general election. It is possible that a robust speech on "Europe" by Cameron might claw back some hope, but with the prime minister embracing gay marriage and other issues inimical to the Tory Right, he is burning his bridges with some verve. Constituency activists are deserting him in their droves, with local parties in meltdown".


The Conservative party grassroots might be outraged, but I don't think the electorate in general are really all that bothered about gays getting married in church. Probably because most of the electorate don't go there anymore anyway! In short, they're indifferent. It's a none issue for most. In fact the whole 'gay' thing is a none issue. And Cameron will have known that.

Jo







That is as maybe, but Cameron still needs his workers. Constituency activity may account for between 5-10 percent of the vote ... he cannot afford to lose those votes.

nemesis
#14 Posted : 10 December 2012 18:17:16(UTC)
nemesis

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 47
United Kingdom
Location: Middlesex

Thanks: 32 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: JO Go to Quoted Post
Richard wrote:

Quote:
"In the shorter term, though, there is little confidence in the Tory ranks that they will win the 2015 general election. It is possible that a robust speech on "Europe" by Cameron might claw back some hope, but with the prime minister embracing gay marriage and other issues inimical to the Tory Right, he is burning his bridges with some verve. Constituency activists are deserting him in their droves, with local parties in meltdown".


The Conservative party grassroots might be outraged, but I don't think the electorate in general are really all that bothered about gays getting married in church. Probably because most of the electorate don't go there anymore anyway! In short, they're indifferent. It's a none issue for most. In fact the whole 'gay' thing is a none issue. And Cameron will have known that.

Jo







That is as maybe, but Cameron still needs his workers. Constituency activity may account for between 5-10 percent of the vote ... he cannot afford to lose those votes.


Cameron is a stupid man, but is he that stupid or perhaps - is he being set up to fail on the gay marriage thing ?
Or is my devious mind doing overtime?

Mark B
#15 Posted : 10 December 2012 19:06:16(UTC)
Mark B

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 108

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Quote:
Dr. North wrote:
Unfortunately, that would mean we are looking at 2020 before we can see a serious attempt to withdraw from the EU, although this would not be very much longer than any timetable, should Cameron survive in office. The earliest one might expect an "in-out" referendum from him would be 2018.


By then it will be too late.

One is forgetting the demographics, and by then, most of the people living here will regard themselves to be more European than British. Joining the Eurozone complete with Euro would seem a good idea to them. No need to exchange 'silly old Sterling' for Euro's when sending money back home. Just join the Euro, and forget about all that exchange rate nonsense.

The sands of time are running out. Labour will win. They will set to work so that they will be able to maintain power forever, by splitting England up ad than selling us down the Euro-river. Not that any of the others wouldn't do the same.

The Economy is flat-lining at best, immigration is out of control, unemployment is rising, the value of peoples savings and pension incomes are falling (QE). But don't worry boys and girls, Cast Iron Dave will fix things. All we need is a bit of gay marriage to put us straight.

Seriously though, these people have given away 'so much power', as to become meaningless.
stuart
#16 Posted : 10 December 2012 19:20:02(UTC)
stuart

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 155
United Kingdom
Location: Andover

Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)
I thought you said Paterson is rubbish at public speaking and not PM material?
SeanOHare
#17 Posted : 10 December 2012 19:32:18(UTC)
SeanOHare

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 38
United Kingdom
Location: Wiltshire

Thanks: 11 times
Originally Posted by: Mark B Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Dr. North wrote:
Unfortunately, that would mean we are looking at 2020 before we can see a serious attempt to withdraw from the EU, although this would not be very much longer than any timetable, should Cameron survive in office. The earliest one might expect an "in-out" referendum from him would be 2018.



By then it will be too late.




That is my main concern. Things are hotting up apace and I am afraid that by 2020 the Article 50 option will have been withdrawn. Probably in the next treaty Labour sign illegally on our behalf.

Honestly I don't know what is the best option. I am 100% for the Harrogate Agenda, but am dismayed in realising that "the long haul" may well mean that it is overtaken by events. The chaos that would be caused by repeal of ECA 1972 is nothing to the mahem that will ensue when people finally hit the streets.

The English have not spoken yet!

Edited by user 10 December 2012 19:33:12(UTC)  | Reason: correct a typo

comet
#18 Posted : 10 December 2012 19:33:35(UTC)
comet

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 617
United Kingdom
Location: gloucestershire

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 66 time(s) in 54 post(s)
Originally Posted by: JO Go to Quoted Post
Richard wrote:

Quote:
"In the shorter term, though, there is little confidence in the Tory ranks that they will win the 2015 general election. It is possible that a robust speech on "Europe" by Cameron might claw back some hope, but with the prime minister embracing gay marriage and other issues inimical to the Tory Right, he is burning his bridges with some verve. Constituency activists are deserting him in their droves, with local parties in meltdown".


The Conservative party grassroots might be outraged, but I don't think the electorate in general are really all that bothered about gays getting married in church. Probably because most of the electorate don't go there anymore anyway! In short, they're indifferent. It's a none issue for most. In fact the whole 'gay' thing is a none issue. And Cameron will have known that.



I think another significant small proportion are bent out of shape enough to leave. The majority wonder why he's making so much of a song and dance over this non-issue when there are surely more pressing matters. It's the equivalent of going off to play with his train set.

This small proportion and that small proportion (green energy putting up bills, foreign aid, tackling corruption in Africa, the EU etc, etc) adds up to quite a large small proportion leaving and the majority scratching their heads.

And then there's the much awaited statement on 'Europe' for the slow learners. He's definitely, unequivocably going to lay the cards on the table, well some cards, not necessarily his cards and he didn't necessarily mean the table people assumed he meant.

I wonder if we could see a break away Tory party as the SDLP broke away from the Labour Party?

Edited by user 10 December 2012 19:44:20(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

richard
#19 Posted : 10 December 2012 19:39:39(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,040
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: stuart Go to Quoted Post
I thought you said Paterson is rubbish at public speaking and not PM material?





I don't think "rubbish" was my term. But it is not his best attribute. However, sometimes people change ... and grow into the job. His recent performance has been quite impressive.

Edited by user 10 December 2012 19:41:04(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

comet
#20 Posted : 10 December 2012 19:42:06(UTC)
comet

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 617
United Kingdom
Location: gloucestershire

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 66 time(s) in 54 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Mark B Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Dr. North wrote:
Unfortunately, that would mean we are looking at 2020 before we can see a serious attempt to withdraw from the EU, although this would not be very much longer than any timetable, should Cameron survive in office. The earliest one might expect an "in-out" referendum from him would be 2018.


By then it will be too late.

One is forgetting the demographics, and by then, most of the people living here will regard themselves to be more European than British. Joining the Eurozone complete with Euro would seem a good idea to them. No need to exchange 'silly old Sterling' for Euro's when sending money back home. Just join the Euro, and forget about all that exchange rate nonsense.



It hasn't happened in 40 years and the EU and Eurozone are looking like a leaky ship. In 2020 we'll probably see what happened to the PIIGS, and France, and it may not be pretty.

My guess has always been that we will see a Labour or Conservative government forced against its will to get out of the EU, largely by the EU. Nothing so simple as electing a UKIP government.

I'd agree that a Labour government with a working majority was highly likely next GE.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.318 seconds.