logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

richard
#1 Posted : 04 November 2012 14:59:30(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
It takes the chief political correspondent of the loss-making Guardian in order for us to learn that IDS is saying that we don't give enough credit to David Cameron – "the first man to veto a European treaty".

When you get that profound level of ignorance among senior Tory ministers, there is no going back. You are not dealing with people of this world, people who are actually capable of understanding what is going on around them, and reacting sensibly to what they learn.

And from the mouth of the babe, we also learn that he [Cameron] "will veto something [on the EU budget] that he cannot bring back to the British parliament". These, says IDS, "are strong words compared to the last government and even governments before". Thus, Duncan Smith disagrees with the "rebels", telling Andrew Marr's Ego Show that, "He [Cameron] would love to come back with a real terms cut. I would love him to be able to do it".

View full article here
vincent
#2 Posted : 04 November 2012 16:04:32(UTC)
vincent

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 925
United Kingdom
Location: Sunderland

Thanks: 76 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Quote:
Sooner or later, Cameron himself is going to have to come to terms with the changing EU scenarios, whence he will find that his prolonged manoeuvring has achieved precisely nothing. The choice on offer will be accept "second class status" or get out, and the "colleagues" care not which.



You know for once, I am happy to take second class status.ThumpUp
richard
#3 Posted : 04 November 2012 16:20:35(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: vincent Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Sooner or later, Cameron himself is going to have to come to terms with the changing EU scenarios, whence he will find that his prolonged manoeuvring has achieved precisely nothing. The choice on offer will be accept "second class status" or get out, and the "colleagues" care not which.



You know for once, I am happy to take second class status.ThumpUp





The worst of all possible worlds ... neither in nor out, bearing all the expense, all the regulation without even sitting at the "top table" ... that, at least, is how it must be sold.

vincent
#4 Posted : 04 November 2012 16:40:28(UTC)
vincent

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 925
United Kingdom
Location: Sunderland

Thanks: 76 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: vincent Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Sooner or later, Cameron himself is going to have to come to terms with the changing EU scenarios, whence he will find that his prolonged manoeuvring has achieved precisely nothing. The choice on offer will be accept "second class status" or get out, and the "colleagues" care not which.



You know for once, I am happy to take second class status.ThumpUp





The worst of all possible worlds ... neither in nor out, bearing all the expense, all the regulation without even sitting at the "top table" ... that, at least, is how it must be sold.


Oh I see the difference now.

I did mean that we will be better off out,just we do need to get a trading partnership with the EU.
Who in their right minds would accept being an "outer" but yet still stay in the EU?
Dodgy Geezer
#5 Posted : 04 November 2012 17:00:29(UTC)
Dodgy Geezer

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 329
United Kingdom

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Yawn... wake me up either on Nov 8 if Cyprus doesn't get its bailout, or Nov 16 if Greece doesn't get its next one...
latipa
#6 Posted : 04 November 2012 17:58:04(UTC)
latipa

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/09/2012(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Continental Europe

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
If the EU reverts back to an annual budget, they are allowed to increase the budget by a couple of percentages, not?
richard
#7 Posted : 04 November 2012 18:14:31(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,039
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 97 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: latipa Go to Quoted Post
If the EU reverts back to an annual budget, they are allowed to increase the budget by a couple of percentages, not?



Yes ... on QMV ... and nothing Mr Cameron can do about it.

euSSR Go Home
#8 Posted : 04 November 2012 19:16:14(UTC)
euSSR Go Home

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 165
Location: None

Thanks: 32 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richard Go to Quoted Post
. . . we also learn that he [Cameron] "will veto something [on the EU budget] that he cannot bring back to the British parliament". These, says IDS, "are strong words compared to the last government and even governments before". Thus, Duncan Smith disagrees with the "rebels", telling Andrew Marr's Ego Show that, "He [Cameron] would love to come back with a real terms cut. I would love him to be able to do it".
View full article here

Ah well, Dr. N. Here he is again posturing in the murky shadow of Bliar and Chamberlain ... riding back here on the same pale horse and waving bits of paper like theirs. Be the claptrap labelled "concessions" or "vetos," it makes no matter: by binding us to 30++ other edicts, the Governors of Britain have given away far more of the national treasure.

As to:
richard wrote:
The choice on offer will be accept "second class status" or get out, and the "colleagues" care not which.
I agree with you and all here ... and it must ultimately be "out." The "colleagues" can afford to be cavalier because they have faith in their own craftiness; thereby, we will continue to pay them the highest of fees for ever diminishing returns. Presumably Camoron enjoys gambling with our money; perhaps, too, his personal wealth cocoons him from further perception of the consequences. Though quite why the other liblabcons feel safe is a mystery. Have they never heard of "useful idiots"?

Edited by user 04 November 2012 19:26:34(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

stuart
#9 Posted : 05 November 2012 08:40:36(UTC)
stuart

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 155
United Kingdom
Location: Andover

Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)
They are a bright bunch down at the Telegraph:

"There is no point in prevarication: experience shows that the EU’s response is simply to spend more money, and take more powers. "

"Others insist that the real priority is to press for reform of the EU’s “Structural and Cohesion Funds”. As we report today, huge sums are misspent by these Funds. Britain’s contribution would be far more efficiently allocated, and much less likely to be wasted, if it did not go via Brussels, but was spent in Britain – with the decisions on how to spend it also taken here."

How's that for some masturbation?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.236 seconds.