25/06/2011
If you want an example of cheap and easy journalism, the above is a
good example - all generalities, but naming no names. If you really want to hurt them, though, and force through change, you have to name names, as we did in
April 2005, going after Barroso and Spiros Latsis, and their
little scam.
Booker and I did a
lot of work on this and, for once,
UKIP did some good work. As the
story unfolded, it was very clear that the Latsis empire was involved in a massive network of bribery and corruption, including the EU commission and
much, much more.
And what happened? The piece that Booker did in
The Sunday Telegraph got pulled, and
this was forced on us by a nervous newspaper management. The EU parliament stuff that we
were able to report eventually was sunk by
gutless MEPs and with the rest of the MSM also diving for cover,
we got nowhere.
The
Mail story is right in principle. Greece is being dragged down by a huge amount of corruption â but the problem starts with billionaire robber barons who are stealing on an industrial scale, with the help of a nexus of international partners, in which the EU and Barroso are central players.
So doing nice, soft, easy stories is going to achieve precisely nothing â but just what you expect from the entertainment industry.
COMMENT THREAD