24/11/2009
"It may be that there's an innocent explanation for all this... but there needs to be a fundamental independent inquiry to get at the truth."
So says
Nigel Lawson, with Prof Jones on the back foot, denying that he had massaged temperature figures.
A spokesman for the Dept of Energy and Climate Change still insists that the evidence for "climate change" is overwhelming but even the little Moonbat
is going wobbly - to his very great credit
says WUWT.
The real "smoking gun", however â or so
we are told - lies in the code. Here, there is evidence that tree ring data are "artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures."
It looks, says
Welt online, as if they have a
Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem. There are some times when only German will do.
CLIMATEGATE THREAD